User talk:B3rnad3tt3c

Your recent edits

(talk page stalker) Greetings. I saw your post on ViewmontViking's page and thought I could offer some outsider's insight into this. It would appear that the individual was not notable enough for their own article. A discussion on this resulted in the article being deleted and merged into another article. If you feel that the situation has changed, you may want to raise that on the article's talk page, so other editors can see your line of thinking. Good luck! --McDoobAU93 15:15, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm not seeing where to reply to you and appreciate you contacting me. Where do I find the talk page you suggest above? All the info is true and correct and can be backed up from IMDB too plus the physical movies and TVC shows. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B3rnad3tt3c (talk • contribs)

• That something is 'true' does not mean it rises to the level of inclusion on Wikipedia. See WP:TRUTH. There are millions of entertainers in the world. We do not include articles on all of them. We have established a criteria for this, which you can see at WP:ENT. In a deletion discussion in 2014, linked above, it was decided that Tiarnie Coupland did not exceed that standard. Nothing in her career has further established herself under WP:ENT that would qualify her for an article. You should also STOP reverting people who have removed your content. This constitutes an edit war. See Wikipedia:Edit warring. Discussion is the way forward, not edit warring to try to force something onto the project that others are telling you is not acceptable. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:41, 14 July 2016 (UTC)
• Also, in this edit you referring to Tiarnie Coupland as being "my page". Understand; it isn't your page. Nobody has personal rights to a particular page. Even Tiarnie herself would not have rights to an article about her, if such existed. Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of content. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Thank you Hammersoft Please accept my apologies. I didn't purposely revert ppl. I don't really know how this works and thought I was deleting it myself. I wasn't claiming rights, I was giving it a name as in a word by calling it a page. Sorry I don't know the correct terminology. Hammersoft Thank you again. I think the problem is me. Just not really understanding how Wiki Works. Tiarnie actually done a fair bit of work since Worst year of my life again. I'm just updating it now. She's currently a lead role in Love Child season 3 and there are 2 films coming out. One is being launched at MIFF IN two weeks There are lots of magazine cover stories about these roles though I'm not sure if that's relevant? But I'm adding links to the ones I can. I hope that's all right. I still don't know where to reply to messages as the come in Best B B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 18:02, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

I hope it's coming through. I'm actually looking at code from others to help

• Do a submission at WP:AFC. But, honestly, looking at her imdb profile, there isn't enough to pass WP:ENT. Imdb is imperfect; there might be considerable coverage of her that's not been reported on imdb, but it's not likely. Her role in Love Child is not a "leading role". She has appeared in 4 episodes, but she is not a main cast member. See Love_Child_(season_3)#Cast. As to the films, I'm not seeing anything to indicate she is in a leading role in either film, nor anything to argue that either film is notable. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Hammersoft Ok sure. I give up. I'm only basing it on others who do have a wiki from that same show who have done significantly less work and to date. That's all. Plus the season she's in now is current and airing. Best B18:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

• Addendum; please note that your AFC submissions so far have been rejected. You'll need to find considerably more material to support notability. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:12, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiarnie Coupland (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiarnie Coupland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello! B3rnad3tt3c, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 15:47, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Please type the name of the article after full= Tiarnie Coupland and the decline reason code after reason=

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by B3rnad3tt3c was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Example and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Tiarnie Coupland, is an Australian television and film actress known for starring roles in the films The Final Winter in 2007 and Killing Ground 2016. She is currently appearing in Channel 9's Love Child as Maggie.

She plays Maddie Kent on the Australian children's television series, The Worst Year Of My Life - Again!, which premiered on 26 April 2014.

Appearing as a guest role in the 2007 Logie Award. The Upside Down Show in episode 4 - The Pet Shop with David Collins, Shane Dundas

I hope this is correct? I apologise if not, I'm just unsure what to do and am following the instructions above. I hope it's correct. Thanking you in advance B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 16:19, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

• Given Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiarnie Coupland, you need to look not at what she's done before Worst Year of My Life Again, but what she's done after that. That deletion discussion reviewed her work up to that point and concluded it was not sufficient to pass WP:ENT. So, looking at her work since then, none of the roles she has had have been lead roles or even significant guest appearances. Yes, she's an actress. Yes, she continues to find work as an actress. But, she is not yet notable under WP:ENT. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:46, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Actually they were and are lead roles. Yet you have others that's went and arnt lead roles that are??see 2 others there B3rnad3tt3c (talk) 23:58, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tiarnie Coupland (July 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tiarnie Coupland and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:24, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Tiarnie Coupland

Hello, B3rnad3tt3c. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Tiarnie Coupland".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Hello, I'm Hammersoft. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tiarnie Coupland have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Hammersoft (talk) 23:23, 26 March 2017 (UTC)