User talk:B5gram
July 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kenneth C. Davis have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 00:10, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kenneth C. Davis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:53, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
This bit that I have reverted you on twice now is WP:Disruptive, POV-editing and a WP:BLP violation. Stop adding it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:54, 17 July 2017 (UTC)
B5gram, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi B5gram! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:04, 17 July 2017 (UTC) |
August 2017
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sebastian Gorka has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sebastian Gorka was changed by B5gram (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.893113 on 2017-08-27T17:14:16+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:14, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
October 2017
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/25px-Information.svg.png)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sean Duffy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sean Duffy was changed by B5gram (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860622 on 2017-10-08T03:40:10+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Discretionary sanctions alert : post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people
[edit]Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding , a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Doug Weller talk 13:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Why are you removing descriptions that say conservative about people and at the same time adding liberal to at least one?
[edit]These edits.[1][2] Doug Weller talk 13:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
November 2017
[edit]![]() | Please do not remove large sections of sourced material from articles without first discussing the redactions on the talk page as you recently did at Roy Moore. The edit was not constructive and has been reverted. There are multiple ongoing discussions regarding the article currently on its talk page. Please feel free to join. Best regards... -Ad Orientem (talk) 22:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC) |