User talk:BA744PHX

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

US Airways PEK service[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you readded as Beijing as a destination. As you can see, the flight is delayed until Spring 2010 and has not announced a definite start date. Flights are not loaded into schedules yet. As UA have delayed their flights from SFO to CAN, it is not added on their respective pages either. You can readd it when US Airways announces a definite start date. Thanks! Cashier freak (talk) 20:27, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AM is still serving MEX from PHX[edit]

Your statement that only non-stop services are to be listed is simply untrue. According to WP: WikiProject Airports/page content, a set of rules for anyone involved in the aviation project, one-stop destinations (and even multi-stop) are supposed to be included as destinations served from any given airport if they are direct, meaning they use the same flight number, and if they do not involve a change of planes. Yes, not all direct service should be included because it may involve a change of planes, however if it does not, then it must be listed. If you have a problem with this maybe you should try to change the rules, but as they stand MEX must be listed as a destination served by AM from PHX. Deus Caritas Est (talk) 05:34, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're acting as if I'm making this up when it's clearly stated in the rules. Besides, AM is not a domestic carrier in PHX. Deus Caritas Est (talk) 03:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PHX content dispute[edit]

Hello,

I noticed that there appears to be some issues regarding Aeroméxico at PHX. I must say there are some issues regarding this particular topic, which have caused issues in the past. For instance when Mesa Airlines served Williamson County Regional Airport, it had a flight that supposedly went to MDW but made a stop along the way while using the same flight number. To fix this problem a user added the term [direct], next to Chicago. I would imagine you could do something similar to this in the case of AM.

As a side note in regards to Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content, THIS IS NOT AN OFFICIAL POLICY OR SET OF RULES. In no way do you have to follow the steps on that page, they are just suggestions.

Any questions, comments or help needed just drop me a note on my talk page. -Marcusmax(speak) 16:41, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved![edit]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 00:03, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

International Routes from Phoenix[edit]

In regards to you deleting my information on the top 10 busiest international routes from Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, no, actually I don't have a reference. I don't mean to burst your bubble but if your comment: "reference???" was supposed to make me mad, it didn't. I didn't have a reference and I can't find one...so be it! Oh well! ZHoover123 03:57, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Umm I just deleted because there is no reference no numbers nothing regarding what you put in... my comment "reference??" was not meant to make you mad but you obviously are since you had to message me about it. Daltnpapi4u (talk) 19:17, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not mad...but there's a Tope Ten Busiest International Routes table at LAX as well w/out a reference. ZHoover123 20:06, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Good find that should be deleted soon. its one thing not to have a reference but there isnt even stats that show many people travel the route which makes it even more pointless but thats my personal opinion. i dont mean to upset you Daltnpapi4u (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And I wasn't trying to pick a fight either...but I saw that LAX had it, so I assumed PHX should have it as well. But I guess it doesn't really makes sense now that you mentioned it. Apologies! ZHoover123 02:27, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Hey ZHoover i was able to find stats regarding intl flights out of PHX. i just put up the table this morning with the info let me know what you thinkDaltnpapi4u (talk) 18:18, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Busiest Int'l Routes out of PHX[edit]

Hey...I saw your comment above ^^. I love the table! Looks great...3 sources as well, can't beat it! I just made a few adjustments to match those of the Busiest Domestic Routes table as well, such as: 1) Cancún has an accent over it's "u" as well as Mazatlán has one over it's las "a". 2) US Airways and/or US Airways Express is listed as just "US Airways". Last, but not least - 3) Aeroméxico Connect is another carrier on the PHX - HMO route. Otherwise, great job - I really like it! ZHoover123 21:48, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Awesome good job! I was working on it this morning before going to work i didnt realize how long it would take me so i just published it. one thing that is bothering me is the domestic i was trying to find a way to find or minimum "Passengers per 12 months ending August 2010" since it opens up the table to much. any thoughts?Daltnpapi4u (talk) 23:03, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I tried something. Tell me what you think: [1] ZHoover123 23:28, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

That looks much betterDaltnpapi4u (talk) 02:18, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! And by the way, I like what you did to the size of those tables...now it doesn't seem like they're "taking up the whole" page anymore. ZHoover123 02:27, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

July 2021[edit]

Sorry about the Flair mixup, I realize it’s seasonal. Date on provided source I assumed was just there as Flair’s last date for current bookings overall. My bad. No need to be condescending about it. Thanks. VenFlyer98 (talk) 03:03, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiEagle - January 2022[edit]

The WikiEagle
The WikiProject Aviation Newsletter
Volume I — Issue 1
Aviation Project • Project discussion • Members • Assessment • Outreach • The WikiEagle
Announcements
  • After over a decade of silence, the WikiProject Aviation newsletter is making a comeback under the name The WikiEagle. This first issue was sent to all active members of the project and its sub-projects. If you wish to continue receiving The WikiEagle, you can add your username to the mailing list. For now the newsletter only covers general project news and is run by only one editor. If you wish to help or to become a columnist, please let us know. If you have an idea which you believe would improve the newsletter, please share it; suggestions are welcome and encouraged.
  • On 16 December, an RfC was closed which determined theaerodrome.com to be an unreliable source. The website, which is cited over 1,500 articles, mainly on WWI aviation, as of the publishing of this issue.
  • Luft46.com has been added to the list of problematic sources after this discussion.
  • The Jim Lovell article was promoted to Featured Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Hawkeye7.
  • The Raymond Hesselyn article was promoted to Good Article status on 4 December after being nominated by Zawed.
  • The Supermarine Sea King article was promoted to Good Article status on 22 December after being nominated by Amitchell125.
  • The William Hodgson (RAF officer) article was promoted to Good Article status on 26 December after being nominated by Zawed.
Members

New Members

Number of active members: 386. Total number of members: 921.

Closed Discussions

Featured Article assessment

Good Article assessment

Deletion

Requested moves

Article Statistics
This data reflects values from DMY.
Aviation pages by quality
Quality
Total
FA 142
FL 15
A 56
GA 505
B 4,573
C 11,878
Start 15,082
Stub 18,754
List 2,539
Category 11,638
Disambig 653
File 2,713
Portal 629
Project 89
Redirect 1,518
Template 2,489
NA 66
Assessed 73,339
Unassessed 1
Total 73,340
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 250,588 Ω = 4.92
New/Ongoing Discussions

On The Main Page

Did you know...

Discuss & propose changes to The WikiEagle at The WikiEagle talk page. To opt in/out of receiving this news letter, add or remove your username from the mailing list.
Newsletter contributor: ZLEA

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ranch One for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ranch One is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranch One until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 21:16, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Hi,

I understand the Lynx routes are seasonal, but sources for information need to be independent. That means you can’t use the airline’s website and the source needs to be reliable (no booking engines). You need a secondary source that states a route is seasonal when it’s added, hence my initial reverts. Just letting you know the reason for the reverts.

Thanks, (VenFlyer98 (talk) 19:14, 11 December 2023 (UTC))[reply]

Hello,
Thanks for your recent edits. However, it would be great if you could try to avoid using Bare URLs as sources. See WP:IC for more information and how to properly cite sources.
Thank you! (VenFlyer98 (talk) 07:34, 19 December 2023 (UTC))[reply]

MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE[edit]

I reverted your re addition of the domestic state flags at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The advice given at MOS:FLAGRELEVANCE and more generally at MOS:ICON suggests very very strongly that such flags are inappropriate and unhelpful. Maungapohatu (talk) 21:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BA744PHX&oldid=1213907052"