User talk:BJSelavkaS2022

July 2017[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Blue's Clues has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Blue's Clues was changed by BJSelavkaS2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.985125 on 2017-07-13T12:59:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to The Fairly OddParents. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Hayman30 (talk) 13:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Fairly OddParents, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Fairly OddParents was changed by BJSelavkaS2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.925501 on 2017-07-13T13:22:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at WordGirl.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: WordGirl was changed by BJSelavkaS2022 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.926464 on 2017-07-13T13:24:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:24, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is only being used for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 13:43, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BJSelavkaS2022 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please Stop revoking and/or declining here. BJSelavkaS2022 (talk) 15:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Talk page access revoked. This is the same trolling done over at User talk:BJSelavkaS2023. --Yamla (talk) 15:23, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]