Jump to content

User talk:BSpaTruthSquad

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, BSpaTruthSquad! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zppix were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 19:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 20:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Zppix were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 20:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the (D3FB) Huddle (November 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Praxidicae (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My earlier behavior was informing you that improper application of the rules could lead to lawsuits against the entity, which is accurate. I also informed your chat group that Dailygazette.com is a daily newspaper, D3football.com is a third-party news website, that WPI, RPI, Union, and USMMA are all colleges and institutions producing their own news articles on their websites in the United States, etc. to be told that they're not third-party organizations that verify the information presented in the article. You have a clear bias against this article after discussion in the IRC chat. After I fixed the issues cited, you are still rejecting it. As such, I would like you to put me in touch with an administrator. Thank you. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BSpaTruthSquad To be clear, are you stating that if your draft is not accepted for whatever reason, there will be possible legal action? Praxidicae (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

[edit]
Stop icon
You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 21:08, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BSpaTruthSquad (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I stated to editors who are stating that United States colleges and universities, a local newspaper article, and other verifiable references are not third-party sources in the case of the article Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle that improper application rules can lead to legal action. This is an accurate and true statement, and states my rights and the rights of any of the sources cited since the statements made by those editors are libelous. In addition, I have been told to lie in the article by stating I have a personal relationship to the article (I do not) or that I'm paid for editing (I am not). I stated this multiple times, and the insistence that I lie for this purpose is improper. The sources that were cited in the article, especially after the final edit of it, are all proper and exceed many articles approved on Wikipedia. When I asked the editor their country of residence (since that might explain some of the confusion), they took exception to the question when in reality, it might explain a lot of why they weren't understanding the verifiability and veracity of the sources. I am an attorney, and a statement of legal rights is not a threat to sue, but a reminder to everyone that rules must be applied fairly and equally in the United States for an entity to exist in the United States. Bias is now being shown and I requested to speak with an administrator before being blocked. This is improper, and I request both unblocking and final approval of the article in its current state. I would also ask that the last two reviewers be scrutinized for their approach related to this article, as it was grossly improper. Thank you.

Decline reason:

It is not possible for me to grant "final approval of the article in its current state"; this is not something within the power of an administrator. Your repeated submission of that article was indeed disruptive; you are meant to meaningfully address the feedback prior to resubmitting, which you failed to do. Furthermore, your actions were clearly meant to have a chilling effect, in contradiction to WP:NLT. As you have not yet withdrawn your legal threat, there's nothing more to be done here. Yamla (talk) 21:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BSpaTruthSquad (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I read through WP:NLT, and it states specifically, "A discussion as to whether material is libelous is not a legal threat. Wikipedia's policy on defamation is to delete libelous material as soon as it is identified. If you believe that you are the subject of a libelous statement on Wikipedia, please contact the information team at info-en-q@wikipedia.org." Before I had an opportunity to do so, I was banned from the live chat and stated that fact above. As such, NO LEGAL THREAT HAS BEEN MADE. This was an overreaction by reviewers and I stated as such here. In addition, the same reviewers that blocked me when I explained my references were UNITED STATES COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES, A LOCAL NEWSPAPER, ESPN, AND D3FOOTBALL.COM -- a fully independent Division 3 football source nationally -- were still reviewing the article when it was clear they had some sort of improper bias. I asked to be put in touch with an admin, and they refused as they blocked me in live chat. This isn't appropriate. Again, I request unblocking and scrutiny for their actions, as their actions are a detriment to the Wikipedia community. BSpaTruthSquad (talk) 21:46, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You made a clear legal threat. Legal threats are not just statements of intent to seek legal action, but discussing legal action in a way meant to have a chilling effect on other editors. That's what you did, and until you withdraw the threat, there is nothing more to be done here. We cannot stop you from exercising any legal rights you have in your country, but you cannot edit Wikipedia with a threat outstanding, nor can you if you have a legal action underway. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia, but not both. I am declining your request, further appeals will have to be made as described below. 331dot (talk) 08:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS

[edit]

UTRS appeal #37524 has been declined.

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. You need to address your own edits, not condemn other editors. The veiled legal threat, if not clearly withdrawn on your next request, will result in you being banned from UTRS. While you are within your rights to seek legal recourse, you may not edit Wikipedia while doing so. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle

[edit]

Information icon Hello, BSpaTruthSquad. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:In the (D3FB) Huddle

[edit]

Hello, BSpaTruthSquad. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "In the (D3FB) Huddle".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 05:47, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]