User talk:BUS2042

You need sources[edit]

When changing principals on school pages, you should update the source as well. That means update the access date or update the entire source with a new url. Same goes for when updating student numbers. If you have a more up-to-date source, you should add it, otherwise your edits will be reverted. Regards, Steelkamp (talk) 08:26, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, in general, vice principals are not important enough to include. Steelkamp (talk) 08:28, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What source are you using for the 2022 student numbers? Steelkamp (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

well I think the vice principals, student services staff [student services managers, school Psychologist, Chaplain and Nurse] and program co-ordinators are important enough to include and I am using the schools online for student numbers BUS2042 (talk) 09:41, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All I can see on schools online is up to 2021. Can you give a specific link? Steelkamp (talk) 09:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.det.wa.edu.au/schoolsonline/ BUS2042 (talk) 09:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see the 2022 figures. Only up to 2021. Steelkamp (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You still need to include the references in the article when changing the principals and student numbers. You can add references using the menu at the top of the editing box. Click "cite", then "cite templates", then "cite web". Steelkamp (talk) 10:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bennett Brook Railway[edit]

Most of the article is WP:OR - which means there are no reliable sources for the information provided - and all your tweaking can be reverted on that basis alone.

If you are going to modify material - you need to find online material - good material could be potentially from Light Railways or the BBR newsletter if it refers to the information that you are modifying.

If one day a wise admin or editor sat down and checked the article carefully, it could be reduced to a half the size or even less for unreferenced assertions about the operations and rolling stock information. If you dont get it - ask for help. 10:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Also - your assertion above:

well I think the vice principals, student services staff [student services managers, school Psychologist, Chaplain and Nurse] and program co-ordinators are important enough to include

try WP:NOT, and also close reading of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools/Article_advice - the guidelines are there, and it is not one editors advice or anothers predelictions - there are guidelines that are for the whole wikipedia community.

Because most editors focus is 'on their patch' - the best remedy of being too close to your own biases - is to go to equivalent schools in another state or region - and see how their articles stack up... what they include. Many years ago a group of students here in Perth from a local private school got so close focused on their school it was looking like it was going to be the centre of the universe with the detail and context... a very bad way to go, and clearly no understanding at all of WP:ABOUT JarrahTree 10:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Busselton Senior High School. Graham87 15:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this edit summary. If you continue your current wildly disruptive editing pattern, you may be blocked. Graham87 15:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 16:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You've kept up your disruptive editing pattern, despite many many warnings. Graham87 16:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]