User talk:Bace word

"Hello world" ---- My first step into the word of wiki.[edit]

September 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Isaac Newton have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. DVdm (talk) 15:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, DVdm sorry for next time i will keep that in mind. Bace word (talk) 15:20, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Isaac Newton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 15:34, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samvaadam moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for creating Samvaadam. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:17, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi josh thank for the information.

I am currently working on the content and sources for this page, as you reminded I will finalise it in draft and then publish it.

Thanks & Regards,

Bace word. Bace word (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Samvaadam[edit]

Hello, Bace word. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Samvaadam, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Vijay (December 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikhil Vijay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bace word! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:05, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nikhil Vijay (December 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QuantumRealm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nikhil Vijay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 17:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Nikhil Vijay has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nikhil Vijay. Thanks! Quantum^Realm (meow🦁 • pawtrack🐾) 17:09, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]