User talk:Bada12

Borgen Project[edit]

Please don't use advocacy sites as though they were academic sources. Check out our verification and neutral point of view policies and our reliable source guideline for more about how to build appropriate content. Also note promotion of individual organization's and their messages is inappropriate on Wikipedia (see our What Wikipedia is not policy). Thanks. -- SiobhanHansa 02:22, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, you will be blocked from editing. -- SiobhanHansa 16:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Known accounts involved in promoting the Borgen project:

71.231.50.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
71.35.167.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
160.69.1.135 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
63.231.24.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
71.231.50.116 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
67.168.41.152 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
74.61.9.114 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
74.61.43.100 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Borgenproject.org has already been blacklisted. A request has been filed to add Borgenproject.com as well.

-- SiobhanHansa 16:34, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you are continuing to try and promote the Borgen project on Wikipedia. Even without adding external links this is still using Wikipedia inappropriately. Please stop. Your edits have been reverted. It is quite unethical to subvert the purpose of a non-profit project like Wikipedia in order to try to gain exposure. I am surprised a supporter of a non-profit that presumably considers itself an ethical organization would continue to act in this way. -- SiobhanHansa 13:20, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]