User talk:Baird
|
2nd AfD nomination of Michael Q. Schmidt[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Michael Q. Schmidt, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Q. Schmidt (2nd nomination). Thank you. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 17:52, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?
Hello[edit]
FYI, the statement "Avoid using award-winning and similar phrases in the opening sentence" at MOS:FILM refers to articles about films, not individuals. Referring to a performer as "award-winning" in the opening is acceptable. Thank you. LiteraryMaven (talk • contrib) 15:40, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually, yes but no, it isn't that simple. MOS:FILM isn't the governing project of actor articles, it is WP:ACTOR, so that is the project to cite. It isn't acceptable to refer to someone as generically "award-winning" without qualification per WP:PEACOCK. However, it's been generally accepted that the lead sentence of a biography should be simply descriptive in nature, as noted at MOS:BEGIN. The sentence should tell who the person is and why they are notable. Saying someone is an "Academy Award-winning" or "Academy Award-nominated" doesn't satisfy either of those conditions. While it is true, it doesn't tell us who the person is, and they would not be considered notable because they won or were nominated, but what accolades they accumulated after becoming notable. The award doesn't make the person notable, the award is won for doing what one does that already makes him or her notable. It's a fine-line technicality, but it's an important one. It is also often considered POV, especially when one has undoubtedly been nominated or, or won, multiple awards. The POV occurs when the awards/nominations are chosen from a perception of importance of the award. However, WP:ACTOR has the removal in its list of things to do, stating "Remove lead sentence mention of "______ Award-winning" and/or "______ Award-nominated". This can and should be included in lead sections, but not in lead sentences. Please change leads to include mention of major awards, but do so in context." Note that it doesn't suggest just purging the mention of awards if they aren't already present in the lead. In short, removing the wording is suggested, recommended and supported by WP:ACTOR.
- I also wanted to point out to you that the to-do list has some other housekeeping tasks that the project has been working to complete that are easily incorporated into going through lists of actor articles when removing the award-winning mention. Those are:
- Remove deprecated fields from infoboxes; these include lists of awards, notable roles, height, resting place and co-ordinates, children and in the case of some deceased subjects, the "silver" background default field.
- Remove awards succession boxes from the bottom of the articles.
- You certainly aren't obligated to do so, but I though since you were working through lists of actors, you might care to watch for these also. Thanks for your interest and efforts so far in working on these maintenance tasks that take so much time. Wildhartlivie (talk) 20:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Diane Varsi.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Diane Varsi.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Thirdship (talk) 04:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sheree North.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Sheree North.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
