User talk:BalboaRV

Welcome!

Hello, BalboaRV, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Please make sure you read WP:N and WP:V before you move your draft into articlespace; I don't doubt that it could become a good article, but reading those links will help you figure out what does and doesn't belong here. If you have any further questions, don't hesitate to ask me; I'm around a lot, and I'm more than happy to help. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:36, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; you are welcome to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you.

--Orange Mike | Talk 12:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You guys borderline on harassment. I have had three different moderators tell me what I needed to do. Thought I was set, just to have Orangemike tell me I can't use my name. The other moderators did not have an issue with it. Maybe one of you can start a page for Balboa Motorhomes. I can't seem to do anything right with you all. You want me to have a name that represents me, but you can't have a page that represents your self. BalboaRV (talk) 01:31, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are a human being, not a motorhome. All we ask is that you have a username that doesn't advertise this brand of motorhome about which you wish to write. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you'd like, you can just request a rename to User:BalboaRV fan or something of that nature. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's really just a crock. Mike isn't a damn orange and Northern Lights doesn't represent a person. So Mike can't write about the color orange and Northern Lights can't write about Northern Lights. But yet you can't even attempt to do anything on wiki with out people jerking you around for their own kicks or pleasures. People have to start somewhere on here or I guess it's just for the few not the rest of us to learn. Next I'll be told I can't have the word "FAN" in my name or I can't write about "FANS".

I am not promoting anything. The Balboa was a Motorhome made 40 years ago. Trying to create a record of history that others can fill in the blanks. Screw wikipedia till it can get some people with damn common sense. It's the contributors that make up wiki not the senseless moderators. I'm not playing your damn games. BalboaRV (talk) 19:32, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of things. First of all, it's not that you're promoting anything, it's that we don't allow usernames that represent products or some other entity. The northern lights aren't a product (and I don't write about them, anyways; I have many talents, but that brand of science isn't one of them). "Fan" is short for fanatic, so it's not a product; a username like NYYankeesfan (for instance) is absolutely fine. Secondly, I'm not an administrator, and I actually joined only in March 2010, so I had to learn not all that long ago. It does take some time, but it's very rewarding. Finally, and most importantly of all, we do value you; I know this must be frustrating, but if you give Wikipedia a chance I think you'll enjoy it. It took me a while to really get into it, but here I am over a year later and I'm still loving it as much as ever. You'll be able to write about your topic of choice to your heart's content, an ability I've been able to take advantage of. I know this was a rough way to start, but we've had some of our best users have even worse initial experiences (c.f. User:AndyTheGrump; you can do it too. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:04, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My first problem was... "01:55, 29 July 2011 Athaenara (talk | contribs) deleted "User:BalboaRV" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox and Wikipedia:User pages#What may I not have in my user pages?)" I was deleted for promotion. Then it was this, then it was that. It's just games. I have read some of the other users posts where they were in the middle of working on projects. Just to have them removed. Because someone with moderation ability felt like was incomplete. I'm just not going to play the childish games.BalboaRV (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't control what other people do, but in hindsight I jumped a bit too fast. I do a lot of spam cleanup, and I didn't read closely enough to realize that it wasn't really spam, but a good faith effort to write about an old product. That's my fault, obviously. The reason you're blocked isn't that (you'd have to do a lot more than that to be blocked for advertising) but for the username issue described above. The bold part of the block message is the applicable part. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 20:26, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I put in the Bold letters to make sure you read it. You said I wasn't deleted for promotion. I have not done anything but what you saw. I quit trying because ever time I went in I was deleted, banned, or moved. You can't control others and that is the point and the problem. If one moderator does one thing the next comes along and has a different opinion and you have to start all over again. BalboaRV (talk) 20:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting and blocking are two different things. Your page was initially deleted because I tagged it for advertising (and as I said above, in hindsight it was a snap judgment that, upon further examination, wasn't really accurate). You were blocked only because the username you chose matches the name of a product; it doesn't mean you were trying to advertise that product, only that it matched the name. I've asked the admin who blocked you, Orangemike, to talk to you about this; he's been around since 2004, and is much more well-versed in this than I. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:10, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I can't emphasize this strongly enough: our only problem here is the username which matches the name of a product, one which is still available for purchase by its admirers. That's it. We're sorry that you got off to a bad start here, but I really hope you can understand that as one of the world's most widely consulted websites, and one run by volunteers, we have to operate at a near-paranoid level of caution about folks using us to advertise something. As a result, sometimes things get hinky when all we are really encountering is an enthusiast writing about what he/she knows best. Please reconsider. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: User:BalboaRV/BalboaRV draft has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:BalboaRV/BalboaRV draft. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:41, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: BalboaRV (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not make a credible claim of significance. This draft would be subject to speedy deletion in article space. If this draft is resubmitted in its current form or a similar form, it should be nominated for deletion.

Does not satisfy product notability.

This page has been declined or rejected as an abandoned draft by an inactive editor. If it is not edited further within six months after it has been declined or rejected, it will be deleted as a disused draft. Since the originator of this draft is inactive, any comments may be addressed to the last reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:BalboaRV and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:BalboaRV, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BalboaRV! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:44, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:BalboaRV has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:BalboaRV. Thanks! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:BalboaRV

Hello, BalboaRV. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "BalboaRV".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Interstellarity (talk) 18:23, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]