User talk:Bamnera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your two edits to Tibet[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Tibet. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 13:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Tibet. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. ♦Tangerines BFC ♦·Talk 13:38, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009[edit]

{{unblock|I will definitely take care by validating the information before putting on this board and valuably contribute the knowledge by sharing public information on this site}}

Sorry about that block. You should be able to edit now. It appears that the administrator Nihonjoe mistook your username to be that of a company (in violation of our username policy) instead of the name of a town. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia so far. --  Netsnipe  ►  07:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I apologize for that. If you need any assistance, please let me know and I;ll see what I can do. Welcome to the site! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 08:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When I am updating any information, this account is getting blocked & after clrification I get apologize from your side. For such issue whom should I contact further ? Awaiting reply. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bamnera (talkcontribs) 09:49, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the note at the bottom of this page. It explains why you were blocked and what you need to do. ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 09:54, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|Not able to update due to blockage, This matter has been prepared by me & I don't want to spoil it so easily & not particularly due to administrator. I am asking for valuable contribution from those colleagues who are well aware & after filtering I am posting detail here, so personal information is require on this board. Otherwise irrelevant detail will get updated, For your info., sometime back someone was trying to put his advertisement on this board (surname was suthar) and which was never remove by any of your well versed administrator you can check month back history.}}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamnera (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

You can't decide based on ip address regarding sock puppet, please look back history of blockage. Please do not conclude on the based of common ip address regarding who is the sock puppet of whom and above all where is the reply from your side , awaiting for the long time

Decline reason:

This is pretty damning. Smashvilletalk 13:40, 16 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You seem to be confused. You're currently being blocked for two reasons: 1. You appear to be using more than one account at the same time. User:Bamnera and User:Rasikdave 2. You keep adding Rasik Dave's name and photo to the article Bamnera. Have I made myself clear enough yet? --  Netsnipe  ►  00:01, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamnera (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think User:Netsnipe administrator I think you are perplex with username and ipaddress. My username is Bamnera and my actual name Mr. Joseph Gerald. I don't know what maximum I can do now. This is one more attempt to convince you, if you are really interested for enlightening the knowledge through wikipedia, you will surely unblock it

Decline reason:

see below --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 03:32, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamnera (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I think User:Smashville administrator doesn't able to unveil truth, I thought administrator may listen, but himself are not interested in getting wikipedia updated. I doubt whether they are really administrator or destructor

Decline reason:

This edit has still not been adequately explained. On behavioral evidence alone, it seems clear you are Rasikdave. --Jayron32.talk.say no to drama 03:33, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamnera (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Awaiting to release the block, for updation I received from localities


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamnera (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will definitely take care by validating the information before putting on this board and valuably contribute the knowledge by sharing public information on this site

Decline reason:

You are blocked for abusing multiple accounts. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:47, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock reviewed|jpgordonYou can try it out.I doubt whether you know anything or just working like a frog in a small well.

Welcome![edit]

Hello Bamnera! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.



Miscellaneous

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing!  Netsnipe  ►  07:50, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. When you were attempting to talk to User:Nihonjoe you left your message at a new page. I've moved your message to User talk:Nihonjoe were you should leave messages for Nihonjoe in future. Cheers :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 10:24, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Please read my message at the bottom of User talk:Rasikdave. --  Netsnipe  ►  05:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamnera (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Awaiting for releasing the block for updation of detail received from localities.


Please include a decline or accept reason.


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

File:Aerial view.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aerial view.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Vallo.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused low-quality personal image with unclear subject, zero context.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 19:45, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naadi.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Naadi.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]