User talk:Banker212

August 2014[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Macrakis, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please also do not restore unsourced information to Anne Warner (rower) or you will be blocked. Randykitty (talk) 20:10, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And I add that if you reinstate personal information to Ann Warnere (rower) without simultaneously adding a reliable source, as you did in this edit, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. --Randykitty (talk) 13:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Anne Warner (rower). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Randykitty (talk) 14:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Banker212, you're obviously new to Wikipedia and don't understand how things work around here, as witness your statement "Verified by partner named in article! How do we end this??". There are several issues here:

Personal knowledge of something or someone is not considered to be a reliable source; it is considered as original research.
Anyway, how do we know that you are in fact the person in question, and that that person is Anne's partner?
We are especially careful in the biographies of living people to only include verifiable, public knowledge, and not use primary sources which may include information that the subject of the article does not wish to publicize.
If you are in fact Daniel Paul, and are in fact her partner, you should generally avoid writing about her, per our conflict of interest policy.

Finally, if you do in fact know Anne, say hi to her. She will recognize my name. --Macrakis (talk) 14:41, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS One of your edit comments reads: "Macrakis makes unwanted changes. Google contacted. This sentence needs no citation since it is ME." What is "Google contacted" supposed to mean? It sounds like some sort of threat. --Macrakis (talk) 22:08, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is ridiculous, especially the thing about "feelings". I'll happily withdraw from editing this page, but I think you will find that other editors will confirm my points above about Wikipedia rules. Think about it a second. Everything you say may well be true, or you may be some malicious single-topic editor adding presumably defamatory information like "Daniel Paul, a local Home Depot employee" (which I removed a few weeks ago), vandalizing other editors' User pages, and making threats. We have no way of knowing. --Macrakis (talk) 20:56, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your post on User talk:Macrakis[edit]

Here on WP, you're just "Banker21" and nobody owns an article. That's why, as I have tried to explain to you before, one cannot add stuff to articles just because you know it to be true. We only add sourced material. So anybody here has the right to "tinker" with any article they want. In addition, we have a policy called no personal attacks. I strongly advice you to read the links in the previous sentences. The way you're handling things now, you're steaming full power towards another editing block. Please note that this is your only warning. --Randykitty (talk) 22:39, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]