User talk:Barmeise

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silvia Hildegard Haneklaus (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MaxnaCarta was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Silvia Hildegard Haneklaus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MaxnaCarta (talk) 08:22, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Silvia Hildegard Haneklaus has been accepted

Silvia Hildegard Haneklaus, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 09:41, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

COI notice

Please refrain from trying to remove the COI notice from Silvia Hildegard Haneklaus. You have publicly declared your conflict of interest, due to close involvement with the subject, on the article's talk page. That makes you the one person that can under no circumstances remove this notice from the article. Leave that determination to other, uninvolved editors. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 16:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

January 2024

Hello, Barmeise. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Do not remove a conflcit of interest tag from an article where you have a conflict of interest again. Thank you RetroCosmos (talk) 16:58, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

sorry for deleting the COI tag, my fault! But again: The contribution is written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. The articles document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, an in no circumstances what the subjects have published about himself. “Barmeise” has been endorsed by SH as biographer of the subject. Barmeise (talk) 18:23, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, my fault! But again: the contribution is written responsibly, cautiously, and in a dispassionate tone, avoiding both understatement and overstatement. The articles document in a non-partisan manner what reliable secondary sources have published about the subjects, an in no circumstances what the subjects have published about himself. “Barmeise” has been endorsed by SH as biographer of the subject. Barmeise (talk) 18:25, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Neither you nor SH herself have any special say in how this article is structured; in fact, less so than other people who are not in danger of introducing biases due to close relationships. The fact that you have been "endorsed by SH as biographer of the subject" gives you a very strong conflict of interest, which means you need to tread very carefully around the article. Please just take that on board. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

understand, I just take that on board! 92.22.174.114 (talk) 18:57, 4 January 2024 (UTC)