User talk:Barneca/Requests for Jimboship/Barneca

Shocking[edit]

No MFD request yet? For shame! Lawrence § t/e 18:28, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well you are an editor, go for it. I'll support a deletion at Mfd, for the record. Thanks, SqueakBox 18:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some of us might be waiting for him to lose. We wouldn't want to honk off the next big man of wikipedia, as it were. John Carter (talk) 18:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will play all sides. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Barneca/Requests for Jimboship/Barneca. Lawrence § t/e 18:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm almost...[edit]

...going to miss this page when it's gone. Best laugh of the day. - Philippe 22:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd almost say leave them (all the sub-MFDs as well) permanently protected after today, but then I'm sure someone would be serious in a week or month and blow a gasket to get them really MFD'd. Which might almost be funny, since it would be an 8th level MFD by then. Lawrence § t/e 22:11, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So that would be, like, WP:MFD⁸? I keep hoping Jimbo will weigh in, too... - Philippe 22:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously tho...[edit]

That was fun, thanks all. When I listed it at RfA, I expected a Serious Admin^TM would remove it immediately, and maybe 2-3 people would have seen it and commented on it. Responding to everyone took more time than i was expecting, but it was worth it.

I'd like to keep this in my user space. I've removed the MfD category from the page, but left the MfD template up as part of the joke. I assume/hope that no one will demand its actual deletion, but if they do, a non-joke MfD would probably be in order.

I have no strong opinion on whether the multiple MfD's and meta-MfD's should stay or go, but will address that on the talk page of the MfD.

Thanks again to all who played. Happy 1 April. --barneca (talk) 00:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]