User talk:BarricadeX

October 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Digvijaya Singh, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ammarpad (talk) 09:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I already gave a valid reason for the removal of those 3 words in case you missed it. BarricadeX (talk) 12:29, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Milind Soman.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Adamgerber80 (talk) 06:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting a disruptive edit is NOT a disruptive edit. BarricadeX (talk) 14:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:INDICSCRIPTS which was mentioned in the edit messages. Adamgerber80 (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I read it, I understand now. BarricadeX (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]