User talk:Barskyrf

December 2013

Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Robert Barsky because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Greenmaven (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Barskyrf. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Robert Barsky, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 15:11, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again you appear to be editing an article of which you have a close connection or appear to be the main subject. You must abide by the above Conflict of Interest information. Failure to do so could results in a block. Canterbury Tail talk 12:37, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Unblock

If you wish to be unblocked, then follow the instructions about regarding being unblocked and put in an unblock request. If you do so then another administrator will be along to review the unblock request. Canterbury Tail talk 22:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS 46714

UTRS appeal #46714 has been closed. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:20, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]