User talk:Basem3wad

Welcome!

Hello, Basem3wad, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

– Luna Santin (talk) 21:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not censored[edit]

There is a longstanding consensus on wikipedia that the images on the Muhammad article are appropriate and the arguments for removal have been heard before and rejected. Wikipedia is not censored for religious sensitivities, so please cease arguing for their removal. Thank you. henrik•talk 20:24, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do so , i have no respect to this site anymore, a site that does not respect the others opinions or beliefs , a site as i said before that obeys its admins pleases.--Basem3wad (talk) 02:30, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for a period of forty-eight hours for disruption on Talk:Muhammad. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. -- tariqabjotu 04:25, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basem3wad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You should tell me exactly why i've been blocked ?? because you can't take what i say ? you can't accept my openion , then where is the logo "Wikipedia is not CENSORED " , you make me laugh this will be shown on the most watched TV , Wikipedia lost the credibility.

Decline reason:

You need to familiarize yourself with the policy on civility and avoid dirsuptive editing. Wikipedia is not adjusted for the sensibilities of any religious movement. Your religion prevents you from making or using pictures of some persons— fine. But you cannot demand that everyone be bound by the rules of your religion as you have.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

--Basem3wad (talk) 23:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't tell me about civility The admins of this site should be the last one who talke about it , Because you Know nothing about the meaning of cevilization , disrespecting other's belifes in the name of "NoN Censored Media" Is Not And It will Not Be A Civilized Actions. Over. --Basem3wad (talk) 22:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC) {{unblock|You Can't Block me for the Discussion , your rules is all about articles not discussions , you're misusing wikipedia , and this will be in the news ..}}--Basem3wad (talk) 23:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Threats and disruption of that sort during your short tenure here have just earned you an indefinitely long block. east.718 at 00:00, December 30, 2007

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basem3wad (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You will regret on this , This is no longer a free encyclopedia , This is repression. you did nothing to the Admin who called me fool , you don't call this disruption ???????? what the ?????? , "keep muslims out" ??? what the ??????

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Alternative re Prophet Muhammed Illustrations[edit]

salaam, The very fact that muslims have NO say in an open contribution site that insists on having an illustration of Mohammed (pbuh) is all the evidence you need to appreciate the value of developing and contributing to an islamic wiki, whilst still working on wikipedia. In the muslimwiki.com, there is NO and never will be illustrations of the prophet Muhammed (pbuh), And we can also use (PBUH)~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.86.209.195 (talk) 00:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC) Thank you brother ,Very Well Done . I'm in. :x[reply]