User talk:BassemaSC

This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Saba Consultants for their contributions to Wikipedia.

BassemaSC (talk) 07:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Please help me with... An old page was created without disclosing payment. The account was banned and access to it was lost. I need to disclose COI and request the removal of the undisclosed payment tag. What is the best way to do that? BassemaSC (talk) 10:34, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally, you need to return to your original account to request unblock. If you no longer have access to it, you can try to make a request here, but the issues discussed on your prior account remain. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BassemaSC (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't believe I should be blocked. I am not a Sock Puppet. I requested help to set things right for a mistake that was done before and made sure to disclose that I am paid to do that BassemaSC (talk) 11:41, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Admitted sockpuppetry, below. See WP:MEAT. Yamla (talk) 12:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What is your relation to the other account that you mentioned? 331dot (talk) 11:48, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was created by the same company that I am currently freelancing for. BassemaSC (talk) 11:57, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of creating a new section for every comment, please just edit this existing section. What you describe is called meatpuppetry; we must treat accounts doing the same thing in the same manner as if they are operated by the same person, because we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer/holding the phone. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 12:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The tag on the article will be removed when an independent editor evaluates it to see if there are any remaining issues. Wikipedia is not concerned with if the company might want it removed or not. 331dot (talk) 12:03, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for helping me out. As you might have noticed I am a new user and do not have experience with editing on Wikipedia, all was done in good faith. Is there a way we can request for an independent editor to review the page? BassemaSC (talk) 12:09, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have already done so on Talk:Cyba Audi; you will just need to be patient. 331dot (talk) 12:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. One last question. Will blocking this account affect the request for editing?

You won't be able to respond until this is addressed, but the comment isn't going anywhere. 331dot (talk) 12:29, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]