User talk:Basslonick1220

Hello, Basslonick1220, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Basslonick1220, good luck, and have fun. ARose Wolf 17:43, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Basslonick1220! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Can partial RfC consensus be reviewed immediately?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question about another account[edit]

Hi, Basslonick1220. Following up on your request at WP:ANI, could you please tell me what your relation is to the account Altwjh? It was blocked on 27 September 2021, a week before the Basslonick1220 account was created. Is Altwjh also your account? Or did you otherwise create the Basslonick1220 account in response to the block of the previous account that also promoted the CRA International company? Bishonen | tålk 03:09, 7 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]

And answer came there none. I'm more interested in a complaint about an editor who hasn't edited since October. This could be seen as an intimidation attempt. Doug Weller talk 17:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Doug Weller: Actually, I already answered on ANI, where Bishonen originally posted this question. I am not this other editor -- User:AltWjh. The insertion of a highly-biased and inaccurate attack as the second sentence of the lead (positioned so the biased statement appears on page 1 of Google Search results) is going to attract the attention of more than one person at a large public company. For your own edification, Snoogans has made four additions to the CRA page, each of which is either a distortion, highly biased, unduly weighted or a WP policy violation in some other way. So far, after each of these statements is removed by a non-COI editor, Snoogans responds by adding a new, equally problematic statement [1] or two [2], also pushing a POV. Two have been removed so far, and two more have yet to be addressed. I can only hope the situation will not continue to cycle in this way. Basslonick1220 (talk) 17:50, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't think you were, just that you should have answered it here. No one is going to sanction an editor for an edits that old. Maybe if he'd been editing this year. Doug Weller talk 17:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not picking a side whatsoever but in all fairness, they were asked the same question at the ANI discussion one minute before here on their talk page. They may have thought it more prudent to answer there. --ARose Wolf 17:57, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. Doug Weller talk 19:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important information[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. Bishonen | tålk 08:15, 8 January 2022 (UTC).[reply]