User talk:Baylus Brooks

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Baylus Brooks/Baylus cade (June 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

.

To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 11:58, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Baylus Brooks, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Draft:Baylus cade concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Baylus cade, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Baylus cade concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Baylus cade, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Baylus cade[edit]

Hello, Baylus Brooks. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Baylus cade".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Baylus cade}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adding links to your own website[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Blackbeard. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Melcous (talk) 21:57, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning[edit]

Wikipedia is not the place to promote your blog.

Personal blogs are not considered reliable sources by Wikipedia.

Wikipedia does not use original research.

If you link to your blog as a citation in an article, on a talk page discussion, or for almost any other reason, you can and will be blocked. Wikipedia summarizes professionally-published mainstream academic, journalistic, or governmental sources, without commentary or elaboration. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:56, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]