User talk:Bcbudworth

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! RA0808 ^talk _contribs 16:07, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bcbudworth, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bcbudworth! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Reverend Richard Budworth

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reverend Richard Budworth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:31, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Please re-read the guidelines on notability. Deb (talk) 15:33, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reverend Thomas Velley

The article Reverend Thomas Velley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of what he may be notable for

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reverend Thomas Velley

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reverend Thomas Velley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Budworth family

The article Budworth family has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indications that this is a notable family.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your family tree

You've clearly researched your genealogy thoroughly, and while that topic may be fascinating to you and your family, most of the people you've written about do not appear to be notable. Some certainly are, but not all. Also, while your research may have demonstrated to you that these are all members of the same family, all we have are a collection of people who happen to share a name, so your category does not appear valid either. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@WikiDan61: It's not actually my family, I have little relation to the topic other than the fact that a member of my family now owns a house that was owned by the Budworth's and we have books about the family here which sparked my interest. Allthough I believe they are a prominent family see 'Memorials of the parishes of Greensted-Budworth, Chipping Ongar and High Laver' and 'The county families of the United Kingdom, By E. Walford - Royal manual of the titled and untitled aristocracy of England, Wales, Scotland, and Ireland'.

May 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Greensted Hall. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The COI tag is on the article because you have edited the article; you may not remove that tag. —C.Fred (talk) 20:15, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Budworth family

Do not remove {{CFD}} templates from Category pages until the relevant discussion has complete. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:02, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Budworth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Budworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Budworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 05:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Budworth family for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Budworth family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Budworth family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 06:02, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]