User talk:Bckyfern/Amor Vincit Omnia (Caravaggio)
Lead Section
[edit]This introductory section is good, simple, and straight to the point and leaves a lot of information left to write in other parts of your article.
Clear Structure
[edit]Excellent use of headings/subheadings to easily and clearly differentiate the different parts of the article. In every section there are links to relevant topics that can be found in other parts of Wikipedia.
Balanced Coverage
[edit]Your section regarding controversy in particular stood out to me, mainly because it provides additional information to the artwork rather than the work inside of the art itself. Otherwise this par tis relatively good.
Neutral Content
[edit]As far as I can tell the article is relatively neutral in its stance, however the only thing I could *potentially* point out is the Baglione sub section, where the last two sentences possibly becomes too emotional (yet neutral) in how it displays this information, though regardless you could potentially keep that in just because of the fact it still remains objective neutrality.
Reliable Sources
[edit]You've done well to use citations in a few areas of the article. The only thing I can say is that you could possibly find more references to go off of in the future, however what you have for the current stage of your article has serviced you well.
As a whole you've improved this article by a large margin, converting it from one section-less blob into something that has a sense of organization to it, allowing me as a reader to easily find and sort out relevant information I may need to find out about this particular piece, looking forward to the finished product!