User talk:Bdog Drummond

Welcome!

Hello, Bdog Drummond, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Red Director (talk) 21:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not put thumbnail images in infoboxes

Hey there, Bdog. Please follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:INFOBOXIMAGE and don't use thumbnail images in infoboxes. - Plandu (talk) 20:40, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies Plandu! Thanks for your patience :) Bdog Drummond (talk) 21:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Keep up the good edits! - Plandu (talk) 21:33, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noble House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page House of Holland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notification

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bdog Drummond. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

English families

Please stop these undiscussed and undoubtedly controversial moves to the un-English "House of Foo" style. I'm pretty sure the "House of ..." style was rejected for English families in an Rfc or something. There was certainly this Cfd. They will probably all have to be reversed, which is a considerable pain. Johnbod (talk) 02:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnbod: are you referring to the United Kingdom section of the List of noble houses article? If so It would appear that numerous families listed link only to a title (which can over time be used by multiple families). I will make some adjustments to the page to reflect this. AndrewFletcher (talk) 10:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Bdog Drummond: please see Talk:List of noble houses. AndrewFletcher (talk) 10:04, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Depth

Re the Larman article, it's not a matter of asserting in an edit comment that a source provides depth - that's a matter only for dispute; the solution is to supply the actual depth by paraphrasing (or even quoting in brief) the source to prove that depth exists, and to state clearly what the in-depth interest, i.e. notability, the source provides. Otherwise the right response is to delete the sources as adding nothing of significance. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cluster of citespam and astroturfing accounts

Per issues on Canford School, in particular this edit where you sourced a Brice Stratford link to a publication with incomplete publication data, which may not exist under the name you gave it (see article talk). You appear to have abandoned this account, which follows the pattern noted in the SPI, and noted on the pages listed below:

Admins and other Wikipedians in good standing, see:

Author they were spamming for's COI account that has same editing pattern, suspected sockmaster:

BriceStratford (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

(Hasn't edited in years, leaning towards blocking on principle)

Recent accounts:

Craneshore (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - spam account. Indeffed.
Dennyala (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - this account created and began identical spam edits after Craneshore was warned about spamming.
Jonto95 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - created some of the articles those accounts were spamming, same editing patterns.
Cwhillubbyy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) - created Brice Stratford BLP for author they are spamming for.

- CorbieVreccan ^☊ ☼ 19:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]