User talk:BeacHal1

What have I done wrong here exactly? BeacHal1 (talk) 12:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was just adding her academic research BeacHal1 (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, that edit was neutral. It’s from here university page… BeacHal1 (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BeacHal1, I'm here in response to your message on my talk page. Firstly your edits should not have been identified as vandalism because that has a very specific meaning and is not to be levelled at someone just because their edits have not been ideal. I see you have been addressing concerns about tone, style, and neutrality. I will review the article shortly and give more comments. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:38, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much Martin. Honestly, there seems to be a whole lot of bully behaviour on wiki. I’ve just started and am trying to do good - redress the balance of so many organisations that have loads of money, pr and marketeers that know how to manipulate this site already. I’m not that. I just tried to put some academic info into Sarah Bernstein’s page but that has been denied too! Very weird. I just took from her Uni page. I notice she doesn’t have a picture either… and wanted to put something there but I’m not sure how to do it… BeacHal1 (talk) 12:44, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beaconsfield

Some more phrases would could be made more neutral and less flowery:

provide a streamlined resource for the development and presentation of contemporary art, often including innovative sound practise
experience high quality (‘beacon’), challenging, new art works in a wide range (‘field’) of ...
has delivered a consistently challenging artistic programme

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:52, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay Martin. Will do. Just to say though, all of this is taken from quotes or the website or info about the gallery that already exists online. I’ll do a quick edit though of these lines.

I think the beacon field bit is by way of explanation because of the place Beaconsfield and not wanting to be confused etc

Thanks. Did you get a chance to look at Sarah Bernstein page I edited too? BeacHal1 (talk) 14:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The 7 references you have included in Beaconsfield (gallery) should be changed to inline citations, i.e. move them to the text in the articles which they support. Like you have in the history section with the 1st reference. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:44, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I wondered if there is a way of flagging people that abuse the ‘vandal’ option on wiki. Because it seems to me that that is a problem.

Particularly, when you note certain people seem to remove constantly rather than positively add to the encyclopaedia. BeacHal1 (talk) 14:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Elkin has been accepted

Lauren Elkin, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:08, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! BeacHal1 (talk) 15:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi BeacHal1. Thank you for your work on Lauren Elkin. Another editor, SafariScribe, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this. Add up categories!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SafariScribe}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 15:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BeacHal1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette^Edit! 08:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you like WP so far

...or at least is getting used to it. A journalist once said "Knowledge production, at least in the Wikipedia sense, is part collaboration and part combat."

I just wanted to mention that if you stick around, you'll get access to the WP:LIBRARY, which includes stuff like ProQuest, JSTOR and Newspapers.com. Depending on your subject, it can be very useful. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:49, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it’s okay. I’m finding it a bit full of schoolyard bullies though tbh. Which is why I haven’t done much lately!

Over zealous policing. Unnecessary rejections. And some bizarre accusations. One or two people have been great but it does seem to be the Wild West tbh! BeacHal1 (talk) 11:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beaconsfield (gallery)

At Beaconsfield (gallery) it appears that you put references under the References section title. The proper place is to insert references into the text after the content being verified by the references; the software replaces the ref with a superscripted number and adds the ref to the ref list under references. This way, when new content and a new ref are inserted, all refs after the new content are automatically renumbered. Please fix what you did. David notMD (talk) 12:43, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Melanie Challenger has been accepted

Melanie Challenger, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cambalachero (talk) 14:41, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]