User talk:Beckhamaddress

Some friendly Wikipedia policy reminders based on your recent activity on the Cambridge Union Society article:

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Cambridge Union Society, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Wikipedia, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Thank you.

When in an editorial dispute, it's usually best to observe the following guidelines:

Solicit feedback and ask questions on talk pages.
Keep the discussion focused. Concentrate on a small set of related matters and resolve them to the satisfaction of all parties.
Focus on the subject rather than on the personalities of the editors.

Thanks, and happy editing!

--Nhartman 03:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR Violation[edit]

Hi Beckhamaddress, you have violated the three revert rule on the page Cambridge Union Society and have also intentionally blanked sections of that article's talk page on this occasion which is a direct violation of the guidelines for unacceptable behaviour on talk pages. It is recommended that you self-revert your edit to Cambridge Union Society or you will be reported. MikeMorley 16:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]