User talk:Becky-RE-fan

Trish Stratus[edit]

That will not be necessary. The editor in question was blocked. We don't need semi-protection unless he/she/it continues to vandalise after the block expires. Kari Hazzard (T | C) 22:35, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi Becky... hope you're OK! --TheM62Manchester 21:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm OK... feel free to email me any time! --TheM62Manchester 21:34, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note my email address is at the top of my userpage! --TheM62Manchester 21:41, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Nicolebass.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nicolebass.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 15:06, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

A tag has been placed on Abbey & Ainsley, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Abbey & Ainsley is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Abbey & Ainsley. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable.--Andeh 13:26, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings[edit]

Warning[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information into a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - you have repeatedly been challenged to provide evidence that Freaksaw exists, you have failed to do so. Please stop adding it to articles, or cite a source. Just zis Guy you know? 23:10, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not interfere with the AfD process. This includes removing Article for Deletion notices and tampering with AfD votes. If you continue to do so you may be blocked. If you disagree with the proposed deletion of the tom Brooks article, please discuss it on the article's articles for deletion page instead. Thanks, ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 23:14, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Last Warning[edit]

This is your last warning. You have habitually introduced disfactual information into Wikipedia when you recreated the Tom Brooks and Molly Brooks articles again, after they were deleted for the second time under Wikipedia's deletion policy.The next time you introduce this kind of information, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia again. --TonySt 23:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop, if you continue to remove warnings from your talk page you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.--Andeh 13:30, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Andeh 13:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:852274465 l.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:852274465 l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:986077773_l.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:986077773_l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

please stop posting wrong info[edit]

Debra Marshall was born in 1960. If you reverse this one more time, then I will submit your name for vandalism. Just accept it and get over it. Cman 21:10, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Arene Brooks[edit]

You have recently re-created the article Arene Brooks, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. -- Merope 14:05, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FILMS Newsletter[edit]

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

picture on userspace[edit]

I've removed the photo of Debra Marshall from your userspace as it was breaching WP:FAIRUSE#Policy clause 9. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹^Speak 18:11, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-> OK thats fine! Beck 19:27, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Deletion[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Abbeynainsley, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hawker Typhoon 21:24, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I should add, from looking at your talk page, that this article has been previously deleted from Wikipedia. This alone is grounds for an immediate re-deletion! I urge you to contact me on my talk page, or at hawkertyphoonAThotmail.com, if you have any questions as to what constitutes a notable subject. Hawker Typhoon 21:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Paris Hilton[edit]

Hi, you can edit the Paris Hilton article as it is only blocked for new and unregistered users. As you have been editing for some time you are free to edit. Cheers, Localzuk^(talk) 16:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Abititmuss.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Abititmuss.JPG. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yamla 19:43, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Candice[edit]

I alerted an administrator for mediation in the situation, yes, but I also would have violated WP:CIVIL if I had commented directly to you before, but now that I have stepped away and calmed down I will explain things. One match continuing a feud is not a major turning point in Candice's career, therefore it is not notable, whether it's Melina or Victoria or Mickie James. If she wins the women's title, that is absolutely notable and it's inclusion in the article is warranted. But this was a match that is big right now, yes, but it means almost nothing in the overall big picture of her career, if and (dare I say) when she wins the women's title, by all means please insert it into the article. I hope you will continue contributing to this article among others. Regards, Bmg916^Speak_Sign 15:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, whether you meant too or not, you did violate 3RR. The three revert rule (3RR) has nothing to do with the week-by-week policy of WP:PW. Please click the link I provided to the 3RR policy page so that you may better familiarize yourself with this policy. Thanks, and happy editing! Bmg916^Speak_Sign 15:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Candice Michelle and 3RR[edit]

You claim you did not violate the 3 revert rule. 1, 2, 3, 4. Furthermore, please try to avoid disrupting wikipedia to make a point such as you did here In all honesty, I could care less about the wrestelers, i just want to make sure that this project runs smoothly. Please discuss controversial changes. A sign a change might be controversial is a reverision or multiple reversions. The talk page for an article is the best place to do this. Thanks and good luck. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:53, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Factual errors on Debra Marshall.[edit]

Factual error[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Debra Marshall. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Also, as I sourced my edit, it certainly can not be characterized as vandalism. I suggest that you use your edit summaries more carefully. -- After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:13, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Honorspicc.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Honorspicc.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Honorspicc.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Honorspicc.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Factual Errors on Debra Marshall[edit]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Debra Marshall. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Bmg916^Speak 19:08, 18 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Justanotheralter.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Justanotheralter.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:44, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just Another Romantic Wrestling Comedy[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Just Another Romantic Wrestling Comedy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.justanotherromanticwrestlingcomedy.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 19:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Albumgacover.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Albumgacover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. β^_command 22:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Sexy! No No No.... Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. — *H ippi ippi 12:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:852274465 l.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:852274465 l.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 20:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2007[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Girls Aloud discography. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 11:11, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jillianalbum.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jillianalbum.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Cheers, L A X 17:31, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nadinecsf.JPG[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Nadinecsf.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nadinecsf.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nadinecsf.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Girls aloud je.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Girls aloud je.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:50, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia articles, such as those you made to Can't Speak French, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. There is no need to link the French version. It does not have a Wikipedia page, and it wouldn't be notable enough to have one anyway. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 21:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Girls aloud je.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Girls aloud je.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 21:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Girls aloud je.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Girls aloud je.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:21, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Major tracey.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Major tracey.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:852274465 l.jpg}[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:852274465 l.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:24, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Number one singles" box[edit]

Per this TfD, we don't use "number one singles" boxes on Wikipedia, just in case you weren't aware. ~~ [ジャム]^[talk] 08:26, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nadineloving.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nadineloving.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:852274465 l.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:852274465 l.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 10:30, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Debgath.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Debgath.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 04:20, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to World Wrestling Entertainment, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. TJ Spyke 21:08, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Cassie Compton[edit]

I have nominated Cassie Compton, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cassie Compton. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Otterathome (talk) 15:43, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ainsley 2.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ainsley 2.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:36, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!