User talk:Beepoppab

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Beepoppab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made legal threats against another user that have since been revoked and I have apologized. At this time there is no reason to continue blocking me. I ask again that this be dropped immediately.

Accept reason:

Fine, fine. Your conduct while blocked, however, has been less than ideal. Comments like this one will get you reblocked quickly. Cheers. lifebaka++ 00:28, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beepoppab for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Chzz ► 21:48, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re. This is ridiculous - it would help if you could explain this edit. Chzz ► 22:53, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will not comment on this edit. Pure coincident that it's the same IP. You have no true evidence. Wikipedia should attempt to copy the American Judicial system. Instead a small, select group controls all user activity. Wikipedia is a totalitarian site despite claiming anyone can edit anything.

August 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 04:54, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beepoppab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is absurd. I did nothing wrong. Beepoppab (talk) 04:59, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you dd this wrong. lifebaka++ 05:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beepoppab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well...you'll have that. Beepoppab (talk) 05:13, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provided. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:08, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beepoppab (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why would I be blocked indefinitely for something so small?

Decline reason:

Because combined with your history of personal attacks, legal threats and sockpuppetry its not a small thing. Unless you make a serious unblock request you will find you lose your ability to edit this page Jac16888 ^Talk 17:07, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And there goes your talk page--Jac16888 ^Talk 17:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]