User talk:BeloyiseBurron
Hello, BeloyiseBurron. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Thanks, JC. The COI is actually yours. I have forwarded such info to ArbComm.
COi[edit]
I would appreciate your input here: Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Brand.com. GenuineDiva (talk) 22:41, 31 May 2014 (UTC
- I'll do so, but don't want to step on the shoes of ArbComm. You need to realize that your off Wiki issues need to be dealt with there, not on Wikipedia. --BeloyiseBurron (talk) 22:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
May 2014[edit]
Hello, I'm Solarra. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Talk:Brand.com. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend. Threatening people with Arbitration Committee for a simple edit dispute is not acceptable. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 22:54, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. I see that Mr. diva feels you have a COI based on his report to the COI noticeboard. I would assume good faith with him, except his off Wiki conduct has caused me not to. Again, this person is upset because of incidents outside of Wikipedia. Actually, he himself is a paid editor. Ironic that he wants to accuse me if being such. I'm confident in ArbComm that they will get things right. Thanks again and sorry he has tried to loop you into things. --BeloyiseBurron (talk) 22:59, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:BeloyiseBurron reported by User:Solarra (Result: ). Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ♪ 話 ♪ ߷ ♀ 投稿 ♀ 23:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the notice. I left a comment. Please make sure that you report BOTH SPIs editing as you only bringing up me seems to show you being biased. I would say assuming goog faith, as you asked me to do, is applicable to all editors. Thanks. --BeloyiseBurron (talk) 23:33, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Your recent edits[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
June 2014[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 00:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation[edit]
Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BeloyiseBurron, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.