User talk:Bengal Informer

Welcome!

Hello, Bengal Informer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. McSly (talk) 15:59, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your test has been reverted

Thank you for experimenting with the page Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-25 on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Test2

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Mikoyan MiG-31 page. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Mitsubishi F-15J, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:21, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bengal Informer, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bengal Informer! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:14, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

SPI

I have opened an SPI here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rhithin Mztourist (talk) 03:37, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. McSly (talk) 04:59, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

This is your only warning. If you continue to vandalise pages as you did here: [1] you will be indefinitely blocked. Mztourist (talk) 08:34, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you ignored my warning and have continued to vandalise here: [2] you have been reported to Admins for blocking for vandalism: Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism#User-reported Mztourist (talk) 10:04, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hshshshs Bengal Informer (talk) 07:10, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 10:39, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Please unblock me Bengal Informer (talk) 07:06, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bengal Informer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will give correct info after unblocking

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 09:11, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ok

No Problem Bengal Informer (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I wont do any vandalism Bengal Informer (talk) 10:36, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NinjaRobotPirate: I would support unblocking of Bengal Informer. To me, he just didn't how wikipedia works but he may learn. He should be given a second chance.--Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:43, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

I will edit correctly next time Bengal Informer (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Please unblock me Bengal Informer (talk) 07:02, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do the following things to be unblocked:

Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

--Le Petit Chat (talk) 09:53, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]