User talk:Bentheintern

Speedy deletion nomination of MediaCuvres

A tag has been placed on MediaCuvres, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of MediaCuvres and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jujutacular (talk) 15:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article MediaCuvres, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of MediaCurves

I have nominated MediaCurves, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaCurves. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 15:30, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

It's not the sources that are trivial; it's the mention of the subject. However, another user has found new material that gets more to the point. I'll let the AfD run its course (about 7 days) and if the community can continue in DGG's search, the article will have no issues.

P.S. What is your affiliation with MediaCurves? That makes a difference in how people view your edits relating to this topic. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 21:13, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of MediaCurves for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MediaCurves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MediaCurves (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)