Jump to content

User talk:Berchin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Regarding your edit to Cardinal direction:[edit]

Your recent edit to Cardinal direction (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a hosting or shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, forum, or other such free-hosting website links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 21:46, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have again added nonsense to Cardinal direction. Please remove your edits and discuss the issue on the article's talk page instead. If you do not engage in discussion, I will assume that your edits indeed constitute vandalism and will revert them. --Tkynerd 20:33, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your edit to Jerry Springer:[edit]

Your recent edit to Jerry Springer (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 00:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  1. This is your last warning. The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Jerry Springer, you will be blocked. --Kukini 00:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated the article Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. series) for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. series). Add four tildes like this ~~~~ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. series) during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:01, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to fifth dimension[edit]

Hi, I have temporarily reverted your edits to fifth dimension because the terminology you describe seems purely speculative and unattested in any literature as far as I know, scientific or otherwise. If you do have a valid basis for these unusual terms, please cite your references. Thanks.—Tetracube 00:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Berchin! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule img[0-9]*\.imageshack\.us/img[0-9]*/.*\.jpg, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 20:52, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I need help inserting the image of the Now 24 cover. It's on amazon.com but I'm having a hard time.

Please don't make changes like this when discussing future matters in articles. It hasn't been released, the date is just a statement of intent and could change (it already has once) and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. (I'll leave the corrected date in, though.) Thanks!

Fourohfour 20:55, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tag removal[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance tags without providing a clear explanation or raising the issue on the talk page, as you did here. Unexplained/unjustified tag removal is considered vandalism. Fourohfour 12:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Now That's What I Call Music! 25 (U.S. series), are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Purgatory Fubar Converse or Snafu 14:56, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

George W. Bush[edit]

Please stop changing the templates in the infobox at George W. Bush. At least read the documentation on the template first. Silly rabbit 14:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. - auburnpilot talk 16:36, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rockstar music video charting[edit]

If you start editing the charts on the Rockstar, on the Nickelback discography, please keep track of its position on the charts. thanks. CrocodileMan ... talk • 15:58, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

September 2007[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Weekend (disambiguation). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. B1atv 16:51, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Now That's What I Call Christmas!, 4, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 18:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Now That's What I Call Music! 28 (U.S. series), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Now That's What I Call Music! 28 (U.S. series) is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Now That's What I Call Music! 28 (U.S. series), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:00, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Fart. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Benea (talk) 01:01, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Peggy Hill, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Carlosguitar (ready and willing) 01:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Fart, you will be blocked from editing. Benea (talk) 01:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Don Travolta, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eóin (talk) 02:11, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Petit espace[edit]

A tag has been placed on Petit espace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 02:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Blanco calzoncillos[edit]

A tag has been placed on Blanco calzoncillos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 02:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Obama Bin Laden[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 02:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Redfarmer (talk) 02:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Dentist the mentist[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dentist the mentist, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 02:26, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Chis Brown[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chis Brown requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 02:29, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alternative learning center[edit]

A tag has been placed on Alternative learning center requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 02:33, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by Stephen. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Redfarmer (talk) 02:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on Aqua House, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Victao lopes (talk) 23:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Aqua House. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then please place {{hangon}} on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Victao lopes (talk) 23:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Luanne Platter, you will be blocked from editing. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

little warning[edit]

  • Look, Brecher, you have been messing with dates and ages on a couple of articles. I don;t know if you paid attention to the messsages above, but it looks like you are only using your account for vandalism or general messing with Wikipedia. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dennis the menace 1993 the part where the thief uses a rope tying up dennis making him unable to take off his pants with the square on it locking the people who are under in the petit expace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Brianga (talk) 00:39, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ed, Edd n Eddy, you will be blocked from editing. FlowerpotmaN·(t) 00:58, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism. Malinaccier (talk) 01:07, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Ruffles have ridges[edit]

A tag has been placed on Ruffles have ridges, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. NHJG (talk) 01:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block[edit]

|You have been indefinitely blocked from editing Wikipedia for vandalism. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of our neutrality policy are considered vandalism.