User talk:Bertinotti

Welcome!

Hello, Bertinotti, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Tom (talk) 13:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to David Duke appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Tea Party protests. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:56, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to William Nierenberg, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Toddst1 (talk) 13:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Revert[edit]

Plz stop trying to insert POV into the Tea Party protests. Soxwon (talk) 22:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Tea Party protests ‎, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you review Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and Wikipedia:Citing_sources before you make any further edits as all of yours seem to be unsourced and highly POV in conflict with our policies. Toddst1 (talk) 15:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Signing posts on talk pages[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:Toddst1, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tea Party protests. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Toddst1 (talk) 13:43, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]