User talk:Betäubungsmittelmeister

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Betäubungsmittelmeister, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! De728631 (talk) 01:43, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Ethoheptazine[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ethoheptazine, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Azealia911 _talk 23:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dibutyrylmorphine[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Dibutyrylmorphine requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2602:306:3357:BA0:C9DE:1D26:778E:AD19 (talk) 04:50, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Refs[edit]

This is not enough details "Inside Narcotics, pp 37-45 "The Synthetics"" Please see WP:MEDHOW. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 19:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of compilers

added links pointing to Assembler, Digital, Salford, A86, MKS and Regina

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TI Extended Basic[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of TI Extended Basic, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: TI Extended BASIC. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:59, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi[edit]

Hi "narcotics master" -- I am part of WP:MED and have noticed your edits to opioid articles, and am trying to figure out where you are coming from. I hope you will be open to talking. Some of your edits are pretty good, but some, like this one, are kind of "off". Let me explain what a mean. First, that edit was generally what we call "off topic" as the content is about the history of research, and perhaps should go in the history section, but you added it to the pharmacology section. Second, there appears to be what we call "Original research" in it, like "doses which are generally only limited by political factors." Third the sources you are using are generally old - a book from 1957, an article from 1979; etc. This is generally OK for historical matter, but for main sections like pharmacology it raises concerns about whether the content you are adding reflects current knowledge.

Finally, if your username reflects your native tongue, there is some writing that reflects German syntax too closely, like this: "From this research came a generally non-controlled -- or controlled for having the same precursors and effects of strong pure agonist agents of the open chain type, this one a phenaloxam derivative, levopropoxyphene with optical isomerism and one of which appeared to have no narcotic properties but was an antitussive which did have dissociative effects if misused; the isomer from which is removed from the racemic salts to yield dextromethorphan, or remove the other isomer to purify a dextropropoxyphene, or left in to finish with a racemic salts mixture dimethorphan." My wife teaches people how to translate German into English and I helped her write the textbook she uses, so I am well familiar with German-to English translation. And I gotta tell you - that sentence pushes English to the breaking point.

Anyway, those are some concerns I have. You seem to be hear to improve the encyclopedia (we get many people who are what we call "not here"!) and if there is anything I can do to help you , please let me know. And if you any responses to my comments about, I would be happy to hear them. best regards Jytdog (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very good; thank you for the information.

There are many reasons why the history o the invention, production, marketing, and use of drugs, and especially those of narcotic analgesics and to about the same extent as euphoriants in generally, is very important in ths context because it can provide an idea of the how politics surrounding them today is especially important and worthy of consideration, most assuredly it is more newsworthy than the history of z.B. those medications which help lower body temperature."

I am working on a Wikipedia timeline on the development of the narcotic analgesics and any suggestions are always good."

Thank you very much for your insight and I will go through them in alphabetical order for "Neutral Point of View" and a while ago I produced a Perl programme which does an automated search and statistical work on text and will use this tool on that content.

Yours Most Respectfully, Betäubungsmittelmeister — Preceding unsigned comment added by Betäubungsmittelmeister (talk • contribs) 00:40, 9 March 2016‎ (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for your kind reply! Wonderful. Before I reply on the substance, some notes on logistics..

First, you "snipped" my comment. If you look at the talk page guidelines, you will see that, there you should not ever change the content of what someone else wrote. You are learning, and I am fixed what you did, but people get really, really angry about that. So going forward, please don't do that. (I know that I formatted yours -- formatting like indenting, signing unsigned, is consideredd OK).

The wikipedia software is very out-dated, but here are the logistics of discussing things on Talk pages, which are essential for everything that happens here. In Talk page discussions. First, we "thread" comments by indenting - when you reply to someone, you put a colon ":" in front of your comment, and the WP software converts that into an indent; if the other person has indented once, then you indent twice by putting two colons "::" which the WP software converts into two indents, and when that gets ridiculous you reset back to the margin (or "outdent") by putting this {{od}} in front of your comment. This also allows you to make it clear if you are also responding to something that someone else responded to if there are more than two people in the discussion; in that case you would indent the same amount as the person just above you in the thread. I hope that all makes sense. And at the end of the comment, please "sign" by typing exactly four (not 3 or 5) tildas "~~~~" which the WP software converts into a date stamp and links to your talk and user pages. That is how we know who said what. Will reply on the substance in a second...

Oh, and another funky thing, is that it is sometimes unclear where to respond for User Talk page discussions like these. It is fine to just leave this here.

Finally, there are "bots" that can archive your Talk page. I can set one up for you, if you like. Your talk page is a reasonable length right now. Jytdog (talk) 02:23, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, on the substance now. I also find the history of drug discovery, development, regulation, and the deals that companies do to get drugs to market, all very, very interesting. Please just put that stuff it the history section. I look forward to seeing you around Wikipedia! Jytdog (talk) 02:24, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjects[edit]

Just wanted to let you know that there are various "WikiProjects" here in WIkipedia. WikiProjects are semi-formal groups of editors who are interested in similar things, and work together to improve articles, create standards, etc. Here are some that may be of interest to you. You can "join" by "signing" on the main page, or you can just add the Talk page to your watch list and join in the discussions there. Here are some that might be of interest to you:

WP:MED - wikiproject medicine
WP:PHARM - pharmacology
WP:CHEM - chemistry.

Check them out, if you like! Jytdog (talk) 02:28, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]