User talk:BethJaneToren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome, and sorry you're having some technical issues[edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, BethJaneToren! We're sorry to hear your time with us has gotten off on the wrong foot, but we'll do our best to help you out, and you should be hearing from myself or another editor in the next couple of days. I am Samtar, but you may remember me as 'myrcx' when you dropped by our live chat. If you ever need any further help, you can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

There's also Wikipedia's formal training which you may wish to do in the meantime.

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! -- samtar whisper 13:41, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Adventure[edit]

Hi, I heard you had problems at User talk:BethJaneToren/Wikipedia Adventure Issue. The Wikipedia Adventure works for me in Google Chrome 43.0.2 on Windows Vista.

Do you reach https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:BethJaneToren&tour=twa1&step=15? It says "Let's go back and make a few changes to the text. Click EDIT SOURCE". There is a box with a back arrow you should never click in the Adventure, and you should never click the browser's back arrow. You should click the "Edit source" tab. When editing a page in the Adventure, you should always change something before saving, even if you don't think anything needs changing. Does this help? PrimeHunter (talk) 19:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your help desk question[edit]

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:GSuttonBreiding.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GSuttonBreiding.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:02, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tyler Edward Hill[edit]

Information icon Hello, BethJaneToren. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tyler Edward Hill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tyler Edward Hill[edit]

Hello, BethJaneToren. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tyler Edward Hill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Elizabeth Moore, from its old location at User:BethJaneToren/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liancetalk/contribs 18:02, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Liance, Thank you for moving my new Elizabeth Moore page for review. I would like to be sure it is included in the stats of an edit-a-thon where I am registered. Apologies I am stumbling through this process. Can you assist me on how to know or make it be counted there? Tell me what I can do to help. Thanks! Beth Jane Toren 18:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Beth Jane Toren 18:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Moore (March 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-Liancetalk/contribs 18:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. I am working on finding more sources. Her ghost has more coverage than her, but I think I'll be able to find those. Not terribly hopeful, but I must try. Thanks so much for your speedy response! Beth Jane Toren 18:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC) Beth Jane Toren 18:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, BethJaneToren! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -Liancetalk/contribs 18:05, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Elizabeth Moore has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Elizabeth Moore. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 19:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Robert. I hope it wasn't a bad thing to go ahead and publish an addition for the new article to the disambiguation page. I did that, and hoping it will become live if/when the page gets a pass. I appreciate your advice and time. Best, Beth Jane Toren 19:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC) Beth Jane Toren 19:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elizabeth Irwin Moore has been accepted[edit]

Elizabeth Irwin Moore, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

-Liancetalk/contribs 21:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Liance, Thank you for your guidance and time. I've obtained high-res images of Elizabeth I. Moore and will add them to Wikimedia and the article. Thank you so much! Beth Jane Toren 13:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC) Beth Jane Toren 13:02, 23 March 2022 (UTC)