Jump to content

User talk:Bettemarkets

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dodger67 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Bettemarkets! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Markuann Smith (July 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dodger67 were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Bettemarkets. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. KSFT (t|c) 03:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(You responded to this message on my talk page. Let's keep the thread in one place.) You joined the IRC help channel and mentioned that you were a freelancer working for a producer; I believe you meant Markuann Anthony Smith, who you wrote an draft on. If this is true, you do indeed have a conflict of interest. If you're paid to write this article, you are required to disclose that. I suggest that you review Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline. KSFT (t|c) 04:04, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not getting paid. 02:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)~~

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Bettemarkets. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Alpha3031 (tc) 04:29, 14 August 2018 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Bettemarkets! You created a thread called Draft on Namespace: Markuann Smith at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Delete the userpage

[edit]

Please delete this user page and the draft Markuann Smith that is in submission for review. Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Markuann Smith (August 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:09, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Markuann Smith

[edit]

Draft:Markuann Smith, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Markuann Smith and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Markuann Smith during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:09, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]