User talk:Bewbslova
I've reverted all of your contributions. This is an encyclopedia and edits need to contribute to providing encyclopedic material. 165.214.12.80 (talk) 19:16, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Recent edit to There's Something About Mary
[edit]
Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Roxy the dog (resonate) 19:25, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop reverting my edits unless you truly believe they are improper
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 165.214.12.80 (talk) 19:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit]
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Yellow. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to List of Pokémon (441–493), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Thank you.Baconfry (talk) 20:02, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Jac16888 Talk 20:08, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Bewbslova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi, thanks for taking the time to review my block. I have made some edits that may not have been good enough. However, if you read my edits, none of em have been vandalism. If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards. This is what I did and then I get blocked. Seeing that only administrators can review blocks as don't like my chances of having this overturned. Thanks anyway.Bewbslova (talk) 20:13, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your editing is irrelevant for now; frankly you should have been blocked for your username ("Boobs lover" ... am I right?) as well. — Daniel Case (talk) 20:15, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jac16888 Talk 20:10, 31 July 2014 (UTC)- You thought wrong, you're clearly trolling--Jac16888 Talk 20:11, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Bewbslova (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Come on! Bewbslova to Boobs Lover? You have a dirty mind! What do you mean my editing does not matter now? Have you actually looked at my edits to see if they were vandalism. If I change my username will I be unblocked? When an editor replies to this can they explain better the outcome of my appeal. I have not vandalised anything. Granted, I have argued with an editor, but one of these was an adminstrator and he responded to my comment by blocking me? Surely this is a conflict of interests. Bewbslova (talk)
Decline reason:
Vandalism is, in summary, editing with the intention of compromising the integrity of the encyclopedia. Whether yout edits were a deliberate attempt to do so, or were just a matter of your lack of understanding of the way in which the project works may be arguable. But it is beyond argument that your edits are inappropriate and a block was necessary to stop you. Your username is also not acceptable; very clearly it pronounces as Boobs lover, and insulting a respected admin who highlights this does not enhance your chance of being unblocked. I have looked at all of your edits; you will need to address the problems indicated to stand any chance of unblock. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Note: This is a sock of User:Drwho16. See also User talk:Muddafuca.--Atlan (talk) 21:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)