User talk:Bgdigital

ENOUGH[edit]

As near as I can tell every single one of your image uploads has been stolen from hotel websites. Every one. I don't know whether you're overenthusiastic or what, but this is flatly forbidden. Stop it. --Calton | Talk 00:27, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Bgdigital, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Your edit to Clift Hotel[edit]

Thank you for the additional material that you contributed to Clift Hotel. However, in the process you destroyed the page layout and removed useful material. When editing, please build on what is there rather than replacing it. Also please take note of how the page is now structured. I should be happy help if you have any queries. BlueValour 17:29, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit of Baton Rouge, Louisiana[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Kkmurray 20:48, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Morgansfacade.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Morgansfacade.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:08, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Commercial use of Image:Morgansbar.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Morgansbar.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Morgansbar.jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Morgansbar.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. CSDWarnBot 19:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Penthouse.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Penthouse.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:07, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Asiadecuba.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Asiadecuba.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AlcoveKing.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:AlcoveKing-delano.jpg. The copy called Image:AlcoveKing-delano.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 16:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Bathroom2-delano.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Bathroom2-delano.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Aguaspa.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Aguaspa.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:IAN703.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:IAN703.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Copyright status of Image:Livingroom-clift.jpg[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Livingroom-clift.jpg. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.clifthotel.com/clift_hotel_living_room.asp in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's [[Talk:Image:Livingroom-clift.jpg|talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Livingroom-clift.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's [[Talk:Image:Livingroom-clift.jpg|talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Livingroom-clift.jpg]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. BlueValour 23:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Image:Entry-clift.jpg[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Entry-clift.jpg. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.venere.com/img/hotel/0/3/9/3/223930/image_hotel_exterior_entrance_1.jpg in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's [[Talk:Image:Entry-clift.jpg|talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Entry-clift.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's [[Talk:Image:Entry-clift.jpg|talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Entry-clift.jpg]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. BlueValour 23:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Image:Spanishsuite.jpg[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Spanishsuite.jpg. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.fivestaralliance.com/images_/hotel/79043_ss11_fsa-xl.jpg in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's [[Talk:Image:Spanishsuite.jpg|talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Spanishsuite.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's [[Talk:Image:Spanishsuite.jpg|talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Spanishsuite.jpg]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. BlueValour 23:51, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Image:Lobby-clift.jpg[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Lobby-clift.jpg. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.stayinsanfrancisco.com/clift-hotel-san-francisco.jpg in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's [[Talk:Image:Lobby-clift.jpg|talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Lobby-clift.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's [[Talk:Image:Lobby-clift.jpg|talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Lobby-clift.jpg]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. BlueValour 23:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg. For legal reasons, we will delete copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites (http://www.hudsonhotel.com/images/hudsonCafe_noflash.jpg in this case) or from printed material.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article's [[Talk:Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg|talk page]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg]] with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article's [[Talk:Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg|talk page]]. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at [[Talk:Image:Hudsoncafeteria.jpg]] with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own original words to avoid any copyright infringement. Thank you. Calton | Talk 02:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Courtyardgarden.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Courtyardgarden.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyright violation in Image:Sandersonlobby2.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Sandersonlobby2.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Sandersonlobby2.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Sandersonlobby2.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 00:34, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message[edit]

In the words of your rather confused metaphor, if I wanted to "throw you under a bus" I'd seek to have you immediately blocked as a serial copyright infringer or report you to the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard as an obvious PR agent working for the Morgan Hotel Group. And I still may.

As for your uploads, well, there was a great big page of instructions displayed each time you uploaded a picture, telling you exactly what could or couldn't be uploaded and -- more specifically -- the instructions for adding the proper tags and a big warning of the consequences displayed each time you failed to do so. Not to mention the MULTIPLE warnings and instructions on what to do in the notices directly above THIS message. So I'm not particularly sympathetic for people who fail -- or are unwilling -- to read said warnings and instructions and DEMAND that I do things for them.

I've been busy, but now, any urge I had to assist has pass. Sorry, you need to find someone else to make demands of, or you might try reading the copious warnings and instructions that have been placed before you by now. --Calton | Talk 14:20, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:LApool.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:LApool.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 00:43, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:MOND 006.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:MOND 006.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 00:45, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:PenthouseLA.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:PenthouseLA.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 00:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Pool-delano.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Pool-delano.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 00:56, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Rosebar.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Rosebar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 00:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Pool2.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Pool2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 00:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Skybar.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Skybar.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 01:01, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Lobby.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Lobby.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ugen64 01:02, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello from an administrator[edit]

Hello, I became aware of your problem from the conflict of interest noticeboard and I may be able to help clear up your problem.

Wikipedia has to be very careful about copyright issues. Even if you have permission from this hotel group to upload material, Wikipedia will delete the images unless the copyright status is properly notated. Material under full copyright must be marked "fair use" and, as such, can only be used in a way that satisfies fair use standards. At Wikipedia that normally means the image may appear only at the article that directly relates to the image (that is, a photo of XYZ resort in Palm Beach can only be used at the article about that particular hotel). Only one fair use image is permissible per article. Wikipedia welcomes this material so long as the uploader bears in mind that this site is foremost an encyclopedia (rather than a web host or a travel guide).

This hotel chain - which I suppose is your employer? - may wish to release a certain amount of material under cc-by-sa copyleft licensure. The details behind that are a bit complicated, but basically what it accomplishes is that it frees the image to be reused more widely and allows the organization that owns the image to have a link back to its website at Wikipedia's page for the image. The owner may specify that each downstream user link back to that website (on the image page rather than at article captions). In addition to volunteering for Wikipedia I write a column for the online publication Search Engine Land and my upcoming piece discusses the matter in depth. Feel free to contact me at my user talk page or my e-mail (which is linked from there). Best wishes, Durova^Charge! 04:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sanderson Hotel[edit]

The article Sanderson Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Generic spam for a totally non-notable hotel of no architectural or historic significance, sourced solely from their own website. This one's so blatant I considered G11-ing it.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – iride scent 14:33, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]