User talk:Bharathirajahospital

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharathiraja hospital

Hello Bharathirajahospital,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bharathiraja hospital for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Killer Moff (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bharathiraja Hospital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bharathiraja Hospital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Church ^Talk 09:02, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft

I've deleted Draft:Bharathiraja Hospital. It was a copyright violation from your website. Copy pasting is not permitted here or by your webiste. It was also an advertisement. Please do not recreate it. And do not create more accounts or edit with an IP. You are blocked, personally. If you wish to discuss things, here, at this talk page is the place. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 09:33, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

You just used User talk:122.174.141.85 to recreate Draft:Bharathiraja Hospital. I have deleted that per Wikipedia:CSD#G5.

You should definitely stop recreating that article because it may result in your website being blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 06:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]