User talk:Bhushan mohan bhandari

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gautam Govinda (2002 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism. 1+1=yes (talk) 10:38, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcuts WP:AAB [[WP:APPEAL][ [[WP:APB][ WP:UNBLOCK

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhushan mohan bhandari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 15:53, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Because you seem incapable of writing anything other than "your reason here", you'll have to use WP:UTRS to appeal this block. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:36, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Bhushan mohan bhandari, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Bhushan mohan bhandari! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Please unblock my account Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 03:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qaidi (2002 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Archana. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhushan mohan bhandari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 07:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. ^{!ɘM γɿɘυϘ}⅃ϘƧ 09:25, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Gentleman (1989 film)

added links pointing to Kim and Javed Khan

Jurm (2005 film)

added a link pointing to Flop

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:15, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gentleman (1989 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phandebaaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brahmachari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sabse Bada Khiladi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Screen and Hit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Linking too many words makes it hard for the reader to identify the important wikilinks which will aid their understanding. For example, we do not normally link dates, and especially not the individual components such as 9 June 1995. (Readers know what 9 is, and someone reading about a film is unlikely to be seeking our article on the number.) Further details: MOS:OL. Certes (talk) 13:44, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gupt: The Hidden Truth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hit.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick (Talk) 13:56, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello Bhushan mohan bhandari! Your additions to Ladaai have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. All other images must be made available under a free and open license that allows commercial and derivative reuse to be used on Wikipedia.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. You again have copied the plot from an external webiste (IMDB, again). You CANNOT do this,okay? It's called a copyright violation and you will end up blocked if you do this again. DON'T. You MUST summarize and rewrite the information from any source. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 15:28, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teri ma ka bhosda Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 14:49, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

Hello again. I hope Bhushan m bhandari finds your additions useful, but please be careful when editing other editors' user pages. Alternatively, if you are editing in both names, you may be interested in Wikipedia's policy on legitimate uses of alternative accounts. Happy editing, Certes (talk) 17:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 08:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Dharmathma (1988 film). Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 09:34, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please make this article visible on Google Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 09:47, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Dharmathma (1988 film). Certes (talk) 10:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Dharmathma (1988 film). Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:29, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This is not a legitimate alternate account that I can see, so I've blocked it as a sockpuppet. Stick to using user:Bhushan m bhandari. Mjroots (talk) 18:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhushan mohan bhandari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block explanation is unclear block explanation is not relevant to what I did

Decline reason:

This account is not a valid alternate account. Please return to your original account. 331dot (talk) 12:30, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Further decline reason: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhushan m bhandari. Mjroots (talk) 05:55, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhushan mohan bhandari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 14:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please log into your original account and request an unblock there. PhilKnight (talk) 08:02, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Stop posting multiple unblock requests only one is needed. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:25, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bhushan mohan bhandari (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 03:05, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unclear if you are trolling or lack sufficient competence to write an unblock request. Yamla (talk) 11:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sadness of me

😭😭😭 I have requested lots of time to unblock myself but no one is going to unblock me from Wikipedia so I please request you to please to unblock my account I don't know how to book an block ticket also because I am new to Wikipedia and I want blocked from till one month and no one is unblock me so I request you that please do help me to get unblocked from here. Bhushan mohan bhandari (talk) 04:59, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

If you continue to spam unblock requests without making a decent argument for why you should actually be unblocked, you will likely have your talk page access removed entirely. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:33, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]