User talk:BigBadUglyBugFacedBabyEatingO'Brian

Welcome!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BigBadUglyBugFacedBabyEatingO'Brian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been Autoblocked. my brother was vandalizing on the computer downstairs ip:24.29.37.46

Decline reason:

24.29.37.46 (talk • contribs • WHOIS • block user • block log) is a serial IP vandal. We hear these "my brother or my friend" stories all the time, so NO. -- Netsnipe ► 06:36, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, BigBadUglyBugFacedBabyEatingO'Brian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Fr a ncs2000 23:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to George W. Bush[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --ElKevbo 00:22, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I couldn't resist replacing Dubya's picture with a chimp. I promise that I'll try not to do any more vandalism from now on.

I appreciate your apology! Live and learn, right? --ElKevbo 23:30, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense redirects[edit]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --InShaneee 01:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't nonsense- "speed holes" refers to a joke from that particualar Simpsons episode I redirected it to. BigBadUglyBugFacedBabyEatingO'Brian 01:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There should not be redirects for individual jokes within a show. --InShaneee 02:00, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Why it should have been Greg instead[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. E Wing (talk) 13:07, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Phillip Bartlett[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Phillip Bartlett, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Very little in reliable sources about this person, not much in the way to provide notability.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Raven1977 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 05:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]