User talk:BigBang616

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Elbbom has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Image tagging for Image:HumanTorch1001616.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:HumanTorch1001616.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:InvisibleWoman1001.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:InvisibleWoman1001.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:InvisibleWoman1001616.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:InvisibleWoman1001616.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:44, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:MrFantastic10001616.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MrFantastic10001616.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008[edit]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Multiverse. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. (This includes re-added material, per WP:PROVEIT) Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 18:04, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So, stating that the Marvel and Ultimate Marvel Universes exist is potentially controversial. And even if they were, there are TONS of more controversial articles within WIKIPEDIA. I don't think whether or not information is controversial matters, all that matters is that it is true. Also, if you're worried about potentially controversial edits and want me to discuss them on the talk page first, why didn't you discuss deleting the section on the talk page first. But you didn't discuss it, you mentioned it, I discussed alternatives, then you deleted the section anyway. You didn't even try to discuss it.--BigBang616 (talk) 19:01, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Look, I don't know if you get it, but AS I KEEP MENTIONING, I would like to discuss this before you do anything drastic YET AGAIN. And yes, the Official Handbook does indeed count as a source, apparently you didn't check, or care to check, out the source. Also, it is a work in progress, I will eventually fill out the sources more thoroughly, and will continue to restore the section no matter how many times you delete it. So, until you're willing to discuss this before deleting it again, I will see you then.--BigBang616 (talk) 04:03, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Multiverse. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk 05:13, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, you win. I'm tired of this whole thing. You're right. This is a science/fact-based article and the information I'm trying to save belongs somewhere else, in another article about fiction, just as you suggested. I won't interfere or undo your removal of the section again. You have won. --BigBang616 (talk) 05:39, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:13thAlleyMovie.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:13thAlleyMovie.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The 13th Alley[edit]

An editor has nominated The 13th Alley, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 13th Alley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.

Talk:The Big Bang Theory[edit]

I have removed your comment from the talk page. Talk pages are to be used for discussing the article improvement and not for general opinion sharing on the topic. Please use talk pages properly in the future. ^LeaveSleaves 02:54, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fine. I just wanted to say it and wanted someone to hear it. At least this shows that someone did. Thanks for taking the time to do that at least.--BigBang616 (talk) 04:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Red Hulk[edit]

Hi. I've started a consensus discussion on the edit conflict on Red Hulk here. Can you offer your opinion on the four points there? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:30, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request for your opinion[edit]

Hi. Can you join this discussion in order to offer us your thoughts? We need as many people as we can get in this, since the 4-6 participants from previous discussions on this matter was felt by some to be insufficient. It would be most appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 07:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The 13th Alley for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The 13th Alley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 13th Alley (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]