User talk:Biggest Dharma Chakra

Biggest Dharma Chakra of India History Around 2300 years ago Emperor Ashoka erected an edict’s pillar in this village in his lifetime and during the 13th century A.D. Feroz Shah Tughlaq dismantled, transported and re-installs this edicts pillar at Kotla, New Delhi. In the Present time it is the only edict’s pillar in the whole of the Indian subcontinent, which has 7 sets of inscriptions over it. In order to revive the lost glory of the village, an iron chakra with 24 spokes, made. This was concepted by Dr. Satyadeep Neil Gauri founder of ‘The Buddhist Forum’ two years back. .Since its inception, it is called 'Dhamma Chakka' in Pali, 'Dharma Chakra' in Sanskrit and 'Ashoka Chakra' nowadays. In the past, Dhamma Chakra symbolized not only the Buddha, but also Dharma teachings taught by Him. It was Emperor Asoka, who officially adopted Dhamma Chakra on edicts pillars he installed throughout the Indian subcontinent for the propagation of Dharma. Presently the same 24 spokes chakra is on our ‘Four Lion’ national emblem and also in the centre of our ‘National Flag’.

Structure Completed : 05 - 01 - 2019 Installation : The chakra stand in conjunction to earth’s magnetic field. Type : Non Armature structure Diameter : 30 feet Feat : Biggest iron chakra of India Spokes : 24 Iron : 5500 kg Total weight : 8000 kg Spiritual Significance Twelve spokes of the wheel represent the twelve links of the principle of dependent origination in the forward order leading to suffering, and the remaining links indicate its "reverse order" leading to cessation of suffering.

12 links of dependent origination :

1.Ignorance

2.Mental formations/volitions

3.Status consciousness

4.“Name” and “Form”

5.The six senses

6.Contact

7.Feelings

8.Cravings/logings/desires

9.Clinging to

10.Generation of factors for rebirth

11.Birth

12.All the sufferings

Why Asoka Edicts Park ? In the present times, when conflict and violence prevails among the world nations, perpetually threatening the use of weapons of mass destruction, thereby causing devastation of the Planet, the Philosophy of Asoka’s rule provides us with a solution and insight into the means with which the state could be ruled by bringing happiness and prosperity among the people of state and of other neighbouring countries also.

Emperor Asoka is the only example in the world history, who ruled his empire with principles of ethics, morality & non-violence and caused benefit for his neighbouring nations also.

Features The "Asoka Edicts Park" will have five main features:

1) Replica of all major Asokan pillars and rock edicts in Akhand Bharat.

2) Largest collection of bodly relics of Buddha in the world.

3) Construction of oldest Lumbini Temple and Mahabodhi Temple.

4) Statue of Emperor Asoka for the first time in history of Bharat.

5) Biggest Asoka Chakra (80 feet) and 4 Lion capital (30 feet) of India.

Founder Sidhartha Gauri is an activist, author and film-maker. He is a member of Board ‘White Horse Works’ and author of ‘God‘s new world global citizen and one nation’, which gives glimpses of modern world in the near future.

He has also produced a documentary film on ‘Ramayan Aur Ramsethu’ and co-director ‘Dhammachetra – The Lost Land of Buddha’ on ancient Buddhist sites of Haryana, India.

Co-Founder Dr. Satydeep Gauri is a Dental Surgeon in Melbourne, Australia. He has directed the documentary film ‘Dhammachetra – The Lost Land of Buddha’ on ancient Buddhist sites of Haryana, India.

References https://thebuddhistforum.com/

https://thebuddhistforum.com/25-artisans-taking-day-and-night-to-create-30-feet-of-ashok-chakra-punjab-kesari/

https://thebuddhistforum.com/biggest-iron-dharma-chakra-of-india-2/

https://thebuddhistforum.com/you-are-seeing-the-countrys-largest-ashoka-chakra-dainik-jagran/

https://thebuddhistforum.com/yamunanagar-village-to-have-indias-biggest-ashoka-chakra-the-tribune/

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhamma Chakra (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read WP:FIRST. The topic of this draft is unclear and it is also not supported by reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhamma Chakra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dhamma Chakra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Biggest Dharma Chakra! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhamma Chakra (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dhamma Chakra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dhamma Chakra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dhamma Chakra (January 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Buidhe was: This topic is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

b ui dhe (formerly Catrìona) 12:53, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Hello, I'm Agent00x. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Online diary— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Agent00x (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Biggest Dharma Chakra

Hello, Biggest Dharma Chakra. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Biggest Dharma Chakra".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]