User talk:Bigsexyshaq

September 2007

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Bigsexyshaq, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you. Regarding your request for the article about Bigsexyshaq, please review the above policy. Thank you ^Ariel♥Gold 03:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your submission to Articles for Creation

Please review the verifiability policy, the notability guideline, and the reliable sources policy. The sources you provided were not third-party, reliable verifiable sources. Blogs, fansites, personal websites, etc., are not considered reliable sources, and the Amazon link showed the book was not available, with no plans for availability. Thanks ^Ariel♥Gold 03:20, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your message, if you read through this list you'll find the details of the criteria for notability. In general, anyone notable will have multiple mentions in newspapers, magazines, or other reliable publications. Blogs in general, as mentioned, are not considered reliable sources, especially with consideration to one of the core policies of Wikipedia, neutrality. Additionally, the concerns of your conflict of interest still stand, "COI editing often involves contributing to Wikipedia in order to promote yourself or the interests of other individuals, companies, or groups. When an editor disregards the aims of Wikipedia to advance outside interests, they stand in a conflict." If you are notable enough, someone else will likely create (or request) an article about you. Hope that clears things up! ^Ariel♥Gold 03:24, 9 September 2007 (UTC)