User talk:BigzMMA
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely because CheckUser evidence confirms that the account's owner has abusively used multiple accounts.
(Account information: block log · CentralAuth · suspected sockpuppets · confirmed sockpuppets · sockpuppet investigations casepage) |  |
 |
This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log · contributions · current autoblocks) |
What would it take for me to have this account unblocked? BigzMMA (talk) 13:42, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'll respond here, please let me know if you want me to ceace and I will. There are a few points that need to be adressesd
- Personal Attacks: Personal attacks are never allowed. End of statement. Someone attacks you personally, ignore it. Someone continues to attack you, raise it at WQA or with an administrator
- Sockpuppetry: You socked during your block in a display of deception. Commit to never using an alternate account except in the manners allowed by WP:SOCK#LEGIT, and then strongly consider against having an alternate account. You may also want to make a full declaration of what accounts you have used to attempt to clear the slate.
- Consensus: Acknowledge that Wikipedia is a collaborative enviroment and that your individual viewpoint is just one voice in a chorus.
- And finally a demonstration of understanding why the Topic ban request was proceeding forward.
- If you adress these points there may be reason for an administrator to unblock you. Hasteur (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
- Pages that may be helpful for you to read in terms of requesting an unblock include Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks and Wikipedia:Appealing a block. --TreyGeek (talk) 16:36, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo-ucmma1.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Logo-ucmma1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Nick Newell for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nick Newell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Newell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 14:22, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Tim Radcliffe for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Radcliffe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tim Radcliffe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LlamaAl (talk) 01:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Cage Rage 8 for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cage Rage 8 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 8 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TreyGeek (talk) 02:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Cage Rage 11 for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cage Rage 11 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cage Rage 11 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TreyGeek (talk) 02:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Sfl logo.png[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Sfl logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Giorgio Andrews for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Giorgio Andrews is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Giorgio Andrews until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Papaursa (talk) 01:09, 20 October 2020 (UTC)