User talk:Bilalwikipedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: bilalarif (July 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PotatoNinja was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bilalwikipedia/sandbox/bilalarif and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 18:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Bilalwikipedia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 18:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bilalwikipedia/sandbox/bilalarif[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 18:15, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bilal Arif Mughal P[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bilal Arif Mughal P requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aus0107 (talk) 04:33, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Bilal Arif Mughal P, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Aus0107 (talk) 05:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Bilal Arif Mughal P. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:02, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Bilal Arif Mughal P, you may be blocked from editing. EricEnfermero (Talk) 05:03, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jcmcc450. An edit that you recently made to Phalia seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jcmcc (Talk) 21:39, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse[edit]

Hey Bilalwikipedia, I wanted to recommend you check out teahouse. You can ask questions there about editing wikipedia. I really recommend you read up on proper Wikipedia collaboration and editing. I don't *want* to keep reverting your changes, but many of them are detrimental and are not the correct way to edit. If you have any questions for me, just ask under this and ill do my best to answer them. Jcmcc (Talk) 03:13, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Phalia[edit]

Wikipedia:Phalia, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Phalia and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Phalia during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 06:11, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Bilalwikipedia[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Bilalwikipedia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:38, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate that you enjoy using Wikipedia, please note that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and not a social network. Wikipedia is not a place to socialize or do things that are not directly related to improving the encyclopedia. Off-topic material may be deleted at any time. We're sorry if this message has discouraged you from editing here, but the ultimate goal of this website is to build an encyclopedia (please see What Wikipedia is not for further details). Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's talk here about some of the things you have been doing. We'll start with an easy one: I have once again removed categories you added to your user page. They were categories for articles, not user pages, and therefore miscategorized your user page as actually being part of our encyclopedic content, which it obviously is not.

More alarming are your edits to Phalia, specifically, putting your own picture in there with the caption "Best Wikipedia Editor" and surrounding it with hidden comments that said "Don't change this". Well sorry, It's been changed despite your orders to the contrary. That you felt the need to do it that way implies you knew perfectly well you were doing something completely inappropriate. The only reason I haven't blocked you yet is because, aside from your over-the-top vanity user page and the ridiculous, self-promotional edits you made to that article, you do also seem to be trying to improve content. So please, stick to those types of edits and don't worry about telling the world how great you are, that's not what Wikipedia is for. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:44, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm astounded that your reaction to the above discussion was undo my integrating of images back into the article so that you could re-add a gallery with a picture of yourself in it. You are just not getting it. Wikipedia is not a place to write about yourself and promote yourself. Its an encyclopedia. If you keep this behavior up when the block expires, expect to be blocked again, for a much longer term. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:38, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just couldn't help yourself could you? You just had to put your name int hat article one more time, this time, apprently thinking yourself very clever, by uploading a new version of the map of the area with your name superimposed over it. Rarely have I encountered such boundless egomania. I tried to tell you that this was not the place to talk about yourself, I gave you only a short block in the hopes that you would come to understand that, but clearly I failed to get across to you, and this is the result. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:56, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Government Islamia Secondary School Phalia[edit]

The article Government Islamia Secondary School Phalia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable school, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BookishReader (talk) 18:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Phalia has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Phalia has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]