User talk:Billo94

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Anglican Church Grammar School, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 06:03, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at St. Joseph's Nudgee College. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JRA_Westy Qld2 ^Talk 07:09, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Boggabilla, New South Wales, you will be blocked from editing. --bonadea contributions talk 10:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wombat, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Trafford09 (talk) 13:02, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Billo94. You have new messages at Bonadea's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Just for your information, if you want to leave a message for another editor, use their User talk page, not their User page. --bonadea contributions talk 09:50, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Wallace. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 02:48, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did with this edit to Javelin throw, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. -petiatil ^{»user»speak} 10:00, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. decltype (talk) 10:06, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Billo94 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe that I have wrongly been blocked from editing. I understand that the block was for a vandalism only account but last in my last few edits, which if I understand correctly, were what I was blocked for, I was only trying to be constructive by giving readers the knowledge that without proper strength and flexibilty they become prone to injury. As for the Quade Cooper and David Pocock edits, I went to school with both of them and I just added some information in that may be of value to the reader e.g. what year Quade Cooper made Australian Schoolboys. What I am trying to say is that I understand why I was blocked but the last few edits were completely constuctive.

Decline reason:

see below Beeblebrox (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was not aware that Australian Schoolboys was a real term. That, combined with the a change from "usurped" to "usurged", led me to believe that your edits to that article were not constructive. I agree that the last edits are not vandalism, and any admin who wants to review my block may want to take this into consideration. decltype (talk) 11:26, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The edit to user talk:Bonadea is disturbing, but the last few edits, made after warnings started to come in are ok except for the usurged/usurped one, which I do not quite understand the reasoning behind. I would not unblock, but would support a reduction to a finite period, giving user:Billo94 some time to undertake some self-education in procedures here. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 14:53, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say reduce it to the duration of the current school year; how does that work in Australia? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but I don't know how Australian schools are scheduled either. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:57, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They have different term times in different states. These are the term dates in government schools in New South Wales. I wouldn't worry too much about his comment to my user talk page, as long as he realises for the future that personal attacks, even mild ones, aren't OK. --bonadea contributions talk 21:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Block reduced to the end of current term. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]