User talk:Binky1110/theory

==Comment++ I think that footnotes 1,2, &3 are all primary research. Is that right? What about the rest of the info, is that primary research? This is good info, so now we need to figure out how to cite it as secondary sources.

Also, when you cite something, complete the citation info so you don't get the red warning text in your citation.

I hope you can correct these issues by next week (10/31). Dr Ashton (talk) 18:32, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review

I agree with Dr. Ashton analysis of your paper. This is great information but much of it is primary. Secondary sources only for wikipedia. For example your first source, "hypothesized, serving culture was positively related both to restaurant performance and employee job performance, creativity, and customer service behaviors, and negatively related to turnover intentions, both directly and through employee identification with the restaurant.". You spoke of this hypothesis/finding within your writing. That is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Articles like these may be used but only the literature review part, when they are mentioning not their own work essentially. If the article is speaking on job performance and has a hypothesis on the topic it is most likely that it will have a review on job performance literature because it will mention the shortcomings of previous findings and the reason for why the current research is necessary. I think to support your writing with a secondary source and not primary source will be difficult but impossible.

Jwills725 (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Jwills725

Reply to Peer review

@Jwills725: Thank you for this input. However, the information that i used is from the Literature reviews of the articles that i read. Although it may sound like primary research, it isn't because it it from a peer reviewed article that mentioned the findings of another research study. Just as Dr. Ashton stated on our meeting, letting him know that the information we use is from the literature reviews is our best bet to avoid him assuming that it is primary research. Binky1110 (talk) 20:36, 6 November 2018 (UTC)