User talk:Biographer100

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Biographer100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 06:50, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Roberto Refinetti, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please familiarize yourself with the relevant WP guidelines and policies, your edit summary was completely misguided. Randykitty (talk) 10:25, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Randykitty[edit]

Hello. I was a graduate student under Dr. Refinetti many years ago. I set up the Wikipedia page a while back because of his important role in circadian physiology. The page has been the same for years, except for minor updates. Apparently, you have a problem with it. You question "neutrality," but the article is simply descriptive. You complain about primary sources, but all statements of fact are based on secondary sources. Apparently, you object to a full bibliography of his publications (which, of course, are primary sources), but, in the electronic age, it makes sense to be thorough. This is valuable historical information. Finally, you question the reliability of the "sources." Do you mean the actual references, or are you talking about his bibliography again? If the references, they are all "reliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy." Why do you question it? Thanks.

Biographer100 (talk) 16:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sexuality & Culture has been accepted[edit]

Sexuality & Culture, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:22, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Journal of Thermal Biology has been accepted[edit]

Journal of Thermal Biology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:23, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biological Rhythm Research has been accepted[edit]

Biological Rhythm Research, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]