User talk:BirialaGday

Welcome![edit]

Hello, BirialaGday, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tuomo Town, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gaioa (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tuomo Town[edit]

The article Tuomo Town has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Informal article about local town, likely written by someone living there. No refs and no claim of notab.

G11 and A11 are not due; improvment is possible.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaioa (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biriala Goodday Thomas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Biriala Goodday Thomas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 09:35, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:BirialaGday[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:BirialaGday requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Chris Troutman (talk) 09:57, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Hello, BirialaGday, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Thomas Goodday (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tuomo Town for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tuomo Town is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tuomo Town until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Troutman (talk) 12:20, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Biriala Goodday Thomas[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Biriala Goodday Thomas, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Adnan Enaya Afzal ^talk 12:26, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tuomo Town has been reverted.
Your edit here to Tuomo Town was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.fallingrain.com/world/NI/00/Tuomo.html, http://www.fallingrain.com/world/NI/00/Tuomo.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were adding a link or reference to fallingrain.com, then you should be aware that this site is considered on wikipedia to be an unreliable source. More information can be found MediaWiki_talk:Spam-blacklist#Fallingrain.com here (permanent). Please consider to use/find another source for the information.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BirialaGday. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:52, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Tuomo Town, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 13:59, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Stop creating your autobiography please. NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:47, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

It seems obvious that you have a conflict of interest and you have already been advised about this. Deb (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ok i want to edit only on the things i know am i permited?

Nobody will stop you from doing that.Deb (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Tuomo Town— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Naijapadis[edit]

Hello BirialaGday,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Naijapadis for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 11:38, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naijapadis[edit]

The article Naijapadis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability, nom for award is from an open forum where everyone can nom (some 30 sites nominated, not very exclusive) and everyone can vote (site got 13 votes...). Very few sources about this website exist online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 13:16, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, BirialaGday. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Naijapadis, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:14, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naijapadis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naijapadis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naijapadis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Britishfinance (talk) 21:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Naijapadis, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 21:20, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Cryptic 01:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You know what? fuck you guys

mumu u are

why are you people giving me tough time to publish this page, I have been publishing pages for a very long in wikipedia but why is this one so different that you don't like it, go ahead and block me, what will you gain.

am feed up with all excuses, am the one using my Data and my strength here to do something instead of you guys to correct and encourage my efforts all you can do is turn it down.

go ahead and do whatever you want

Please don't behave or communicate in an uncivil manner toward other editors, or make personal attacks toward them. If you're frustrated or unhappy over a situation, I'm available and more than happy to help you if I can and if you'll have me. Feel free to message me on my user talk page here if you do... but please don't behave uncivilly; it doesn't make the situation better and it's disruptive and does not comply with Wikipedia's principles on treating others with respect. Thanks :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 01:40, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —Cryptic 01:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

am sorry to have acted that way, I was only trying to be polite from the beginning since I start the page Naijapadis I did everything I knew, drop reference and linking from other articles concerning this page, the only message I always got is proposed for deletion, I was busy offline recently and when I Login today, they Succeeded in deleting it.

I became angry because I know I have started many page here which was approved two years ago, I tried to revive it but it was still deleted, I tried to recreate it but it was still deleted and a warning was given to me to block me and the link even from search engine, so I became angry and that was why I drop that message.

I know if I had meet an Administrator like you I won't be angry even if it was deleted.

a new copy of the page is at Naijapadis.com I don't care if it will be deleted again, but I would be happier if it was not deleted.

You say "I have started many page here". You have created exactly 8 articles, and all but Tuomo Town have been deleted, which suggests that you need help understanding what makes an article acceptable for publication. Using the WP:AFC process to submit drafts for review, instead of trying to publish directly in main article space, would have helped. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Pa Money Ombe.jpg[edit]

The file File:Pa Money Ombe.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo of non-notable person.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:20, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]