User talk:Bits2news
AfD nomination of Microchannelization[edit]
I have nominated Microchannelization, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Microchannelization. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:08, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "YouSex.com"[edit]
A page you created, YouSex.com, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is obvious advertising or promotional material.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 18:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of YouSex.com[edit]
A tag has been placed on YouSex.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of YouSex.com and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bhockey10 (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
About Wikipedia[edit]
Wikipedia is not meant to be for promotion of other websites. Here we cover only topics that have already gotten significant coverage in other sources. Friday (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
June 2009[edit]
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Jackson. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - ALLST✰R▼echo wuz here 21:51, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Michael Jackson. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 21:54, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Janet Jackson. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Σxplicit 22:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 22:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)